jonson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2016
- Messages
- 111
- Likes
- 249
I believe Rae has tremendous upside, I'm glad we have her. And man was it timely for her shot to be relatively falling last night, given the loss of Davis' points. We woulda got woodsheded early without Rae and her energy. BUT . . .
Alot of her offensive production happened because the questionable shots she usually misses were going in last night. I wish she had scored most of those points because she stopped doing that one woman warrior thing, but that's not what happened. To be fair, there were a couple of times she actually pulled up and had nice little jumpers, which unfortunately she missed. But still shot poorly (8-20) had 6 t.o.s and generally still struggles to play within the offense (assuming there is one to play within).
Not trying to be overly hard on her, again I really have great hopes for her, but not quite ready to call it a breakout game for her yet. I do however, think its reasonable to start her ahead of Horston, just as an experiment to see if it helps either or them.
Looking from the outside, I can see the upside as well as the attraction of a player with so much energy and athleticism. But I really can't imagine the coach of my team (Graves) or Vic or Dawn or . . . giving very much court time to a player who seems so oblivious to the fact that there are 4 other players on her team and continually plays 1 on 5 or 1 on 4 or 1 on whatever the number of defenders in front of her without (seemingly) giving a thought to passing to a teammate. Yes, she's very athletic and exciting to watch, and I imagine that athleticism allowed her to overwhelm most of her opponents in high school, but, in this game anyway--and despite all the points and rebounds--imo it too often made the other Tennessee players on the court spectators only. And, if one of the problems for the team is not enough movement on offence, why wouldn't they stand and watch when there is little, if any, chance that the player with the ball will do anything other than try to make a basket on her own? To me, one of the major problems with Holly's recruiting was too great an emphasis on players (admittedly highly rated on paper) who are extraordinary athletes and happen to play basketball rather than basketball players (first) with some degree of athleticism. With time and good coaching some of them might become the latter--and, if so, the payoff would be enormous--but, at present, I think the team would be much better off if the roster included more basketball-savvy, if less athletically gifted, players, especially at the guard position.