Ranking Your QB Board.

#26
#26
This is quite a bit of highlights for 3 games

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5jSqkdwu8A#t=254[/youtube]

Thanks POA...hadn't caught that one. After watching it and a few others again I would probably put him at 3 and continue to keep an eye on him. I've adjusted my list accordingly.
 
#29
#29
This is quite a bit of highlights for 3 games

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5jSqkdwu8A#t=254[/youtube]

Is it just me, or are these highlights sped up? Look at the movements of the players on the sidelines and mannerisms of players pre-snap/post-whistle.

Maybe I'm just overworked and seeing things though.
 
#31
#31
Can someone explain why Dungey is down the list for so many of you? I thought he had great footwork, good touch as well as a strong arm, and seemed fast enough to me. Is it just because he isn't more of a DT type qb?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#32
#32
Gibson.

Gibson.

Gibson

If not Gibson, wait until fall to see who develops best or wait until next season, because we have Jennings and he projects to be as good as any of the others IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#33
#33
1b-Charlie High

I never have any issue with a kid walking on and giving his all for UT. Had High stuck around last year, he may have actually seen some game time. AT this point I think the plan is for Williams to walk on. How he does in NC(the rumor was he was playing his SR year out there), may have him in a position to get scholarship offers and would possibly eliminate him walking on at Tennessee. UT misses on a couple more QBs and Williams may look good even on scholarship come December. We'll see what happens.
 
#35
#35
Can someone explain why Dungey is down the list for so many of you? I thought he had great footwork, good touch as well as a strong arm, and seemed fast enough to me. Is it just because he isn't more of a DT type qb?

I dont think most of the people who posted have watched the film on all of the guys. I think a lot are just looking at ratings or just following the crowd.

To answer your question... I like him.. just like the other guys more. For me when I watched his film, I just didnt feel like he was throwing passes that would be complete in college. The competition looked weak. One of the teams looked like its biggest Dlineman was 185 pounds. Some of the throws were thrown behind the receiver a little, instead of hitting the receivers in stride. Wasnt really impressed with the run game as much as I was the other guys. The reason I didnt put him over Williams was because the stats that Williams put up. Also, he throws a lot of picks... and like I said before, his competition didnt look that great.

This is also a reason why I have Waller lower... because of his stats. He had a 12/7 TD/INT ratio.
 
#36
#36
I dont think most of the people who posted have watched the film on all of the guys. I think a lot are just looking at ratings or just following the crowd.

To answer your question... I like him.. just like the other guys more. For me when I watched his film, I just didnt feel like he was throwing passes that would be complete in college. The competition looked weak. One of the teams looked like its biggest Dlineman was 185 pounds. Some of the throws were thrown behind the receiver a little, instead of hitting the receivers in stride. Wasnt really impressed with the run game as much as I was the other guys. The reason I didnt put him over Williams was because the stats that Williams put up. Also, he throws a lot of picks... and like I said before, his competition didnt look that great.

This is also a reason why I have Waller lower... because of his stats. He had a 12/7 TD/INT ratio.

Thanks, that's what I was looking for. I also noticed that receivers had to wait on the ball to get there a few times, but I didn't catch the other stuff. Thanks!
 
#37
#37
Dungey - IMO.

The very thing most posters did not like about Worley last season with his passing is who Dungey is at this point. I watched much of his highlight vid and did not see one fastball. He is a rhythm passer, who was a count slow in getting rid of the ball. I saw him skip the primary receiver to scramble and go deep or run many times. On the intermediate routes he led the receiver open often, which will lead to numerous picks by safeties and roll up CBs. If he does it on a crossing type route it will result in the receiver getting lit up in the SEC. He ran zone read well and scrambled good, but look at the competition. Down the list at this stage in my book.
 
#38
#38
Ok. Watched all the film...

1) TORRANCE FREAKING GIBSON
2) Waller
3a) Francois
3b) Lawson
4) Honestly, I don't like any of these guys better than Jennings. Just roll with Jennings, Dobbs and Ferguson, go big again next year.

this
 
#39
#39
Now that Darnold ha been taken in the draft, I look back at this thread to see how our fan base ranked him and how everyone else turned out.



Wow.
 
#40
#40
It never ceases to amaze how many just disappear and don't live up to the promise. Similar to the NFL, so many drafted, so few are around after a couple of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#41
#41
A couple of these guys turned out decent. I posted yesterday Gibson signed with a CFL team lol.
 
#44
#44
I mean there's pretty much a great chance we are going to get one of these elite QBs. I'm just excited we are in it with them all! Few more years of this kind of recruiting and we will be top tier of the SEC East

Now, this is classic!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#47
#47
I think this thread serves as a good reason why us posters are just posters and not on coaching staffs.

and how recruiting services are not an exact science. There are 25 4* QB recruits based on 247....3-4 will actually be really good? Maybe?
 

VN Store



Back
Top