I feel like the polls don't really mean anything in basketball.
So we were the best team? I hate to break it to you, but it's not hard to see why people would rate us like this. I think we should have been ahead of some teams, but I'm sure plenty of people still saw UT as the wildly inconsistent team that beat a 11 seed and a 14 seed to reach the Sweet 16. They did well with what they were presented, no doubt about that. However, reaching the Sweet 16 this year with the teams we played to get there was nothing special.Actually it was completely 100% wrong.
I know people hate the underdog/disrespect crap, and it's not a great predictor of anything, but I can understand what you mean. For example, in 2007, UT looked completely different post number 1 ranking. I know there were probably other reasons, but I'd bet part of the problem was they already felt like they had proven themselves to everyone.+1
At the end of the season, they mean absolutely nothing to me. Who wants a top 10 ranking when you get knocked out of the tourny in the round of 32?
However, during the year the polls have an effect on several factors; how the players play (chip on shoulder, target on back, etc), and at-large seeding.
So we were the best team? I hate to break it to you, but it's not hard to see why people would rate us like this. I think we should have been ahead of some teams, but I'm sure plenty of people still saw UT as the wildly inconsistent team that beat a 11 seed and a 14 seed to reach the Sweet 16. They did well with what they were presented, no doubt about that. However, reaching the Sweet 16 this year with the teams we played to get there was nothing special.
Actually it was completely 100% wrong.