Rashida Tlaib’s THOBE, and Ilhan Omar’s HIJAB, are making congressional history

[utvolpj]

Surely you can see the irony in a mod talking about free speech. Whether coming from you, or GA, or even Freak, it's in your job description to decide what is or is not appropriate for the board.

I specifically asked about the first amendment so feel free to address that if you wish. The rest can be addressed by freak

 

[Weezer]

When have I ever advocated for limiting the 1st?

Just now. You want me to keep it directed at this question, then the answer is right now. Try having a conversation sometime, PJ. Stop talking at us and try talking to us.

 

[utvolpj]

Just now. You want me to keep it directed at this question, then the answer is right now. Try having a conversation sometime, PJ. Stop talking at us and try talking to us.

100% wrong
VN is not the govt so it's not relevant to the discussion. You're the one going off topic and unwilling to have a discussion

 

[Persian Vol]

Meaning you have no honest rebuttal.

Rebuttal of what exactly??

 

[Weezer]

100% wrong
VN is not the govt so it's not relevant to the discussion. You're the one going off topic and unwilling to have a discussion

You're right, it's not the government, but that doesn't mean a decision isn't made that limits free speech. Since VN is not the government, they have no obligation to provide that guarantee, but it does not mean they have to disallow it either.

 

[utvolpj]

You're right, it's not the government, but that doesn't mean a decision isn't made that limits free speech. Since VN is not the government, they have no obligation to provide that guarantee, but it does not mean they have to disallow it either.

Yet again, not a first issue which is what I was discussing. Since you aren't interested in having that discussion please address your concerns with the board owner. He's been pretty clear before in this exact question as you are surely aware

 

[AM64]

Rebuttal of what exactly??

Exactly.

You called another poster "insufferable" without context or addressing his comment with a rebuttal of any sort.

 

[Persian Vol]

Exactly.

You called another poster "insufferable" without context or addressing his comment with a rebuttal of any sort.

This is precious. W TN consistently spews ad hominems left and right with little to no substance, and I am the one being lectured about not providing support to why I called him insufferable. I called him insufferable because he is ignorant, condescending, ever so often wrong, and simply an *******. Therefore he is insufferable. Are you happy now?

 

[evillawyer]

I'm so tired of her constant anti-Semitism

 

[C-south]

I'm so tired of her constant anti-Semitism

Wonder how much Somalia is gonna chip in?

 

[1972 Grad]

I'm so tired of her constant anti-Semitism

I'm tired of her, period.

 

[evillawyer]

I'm tired of her, period.

Glad you correctly inserted the comma.

 

[1972 Grad]

Glad you correctly inserted the comma.

A comma can make all the difference in the world. Witness: "Stop this bus and let my brother Jack, off."

 

[Orangeburst]

I'm tired of her, period.

For something so important in their minds to humans survivability, they sure seem to be avoiding any scrutiny. Lets have the debate and show American their future.

American voter:

 

[615vols]

A lot. But a great example is her debacle on Joe Rogan on climate change.

Yes, because the members of the left are clearly climate change geniuses. Do you believe its going to end the world in the next 12 years, or is that statement idiotic? Who are some candidates that you are supporting?

 

[Persian Vol]

Yes, because the members of the left are clearly climate change geniuses. Do you believe its going to end the world in the next 12 years, or is that statement idiotic? Who are some candidates that you are supporting?

No one is stating the world will end in 12 years. They are stating that if we don’t take action within that timeframe, there will be irreversible consequences.

Bernie, Warren, Gabbard, Yang

 

[0nelilreb]

No one is stating the world will end in 12 years. They are stating that if we don’t take action within that timeframe, there will be irreversible consequences.

Bernie, Warren, Gabbard, Yang

AOC

 

[615vols]

No one is stating the world will end in 12 years. They are stating that if we don’t take action within that timeframe, there will be irreversible consequences.

Bernie, Warren, Gabbard, Yang

You call owens an idiot but support a woman who lied about having native american heritage in order to get an advantage?

 

[C-south]

No one is stating the world will end in 12 years. They are stating that if we don’t take action within that timeframe, there will be irreversible consequences.

Bernie, Warren, Gabbard, Yang

If only there were democrats during the Cretaceous period.

 

[615vols]

No one is stating the world will end in 12 years. They are stating that if we don’t take action within that timeframe, there will be irreversible consequences.

Bernie, Warren, Gabbard, Yang

Btw, aoc literally said the world will end in 12 years if we dont act now. She did not say irreversible consequences. At least dont lie.

 

[0nelilreb]

Btw, aoc literally said the world will end in 12 years if we dont act now. She did not say irreversible consequences. At least dont lie.

She added ..” this is our ww2 “ lol

 

[VolStrom]

Glad you correctly inserted the comma.

He had to have one of these back when they were $3.99 each.

https://news.utk.edu/2012/03/07/hodges-harbrace-guide-70th-anniversary/

 

[Orangeburst]

Btw, aoc literally said the world will end in 12 years if we dont act now. She did not say irreversible consequences. At least dont lie.

These proclamations have been made for decades. We were told we would run out of oil by now. So prophetic.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

This is precious. W TN consistently spews ad hominems left and right with little to no substance, and I am the one being lectured about not providing support to why I called him insufferable. I called him insufferable because he is ignorant, condescending, ever so often wrong, and simply an *******. Therefore he is insufferable. Are you happy now?

 

[37L1]

This is precious. W TN consistently spews ad hominems left and right with little to no substance, and I am the one being lectured about not providing support to why I called him insufferable. I called him insufferable because he is ignorant, condescending, ever so often wrong, and simply an *******. Therefore he is insufferable. Are you happy now?

Where's Huff when you need him?