Read This: You wanna know the truth about Barack Hussein Obama...here you go

#1

volmanic

JUST WIN
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
3,436
Likes
33
#1
..
I think because of the economic crisis in America many of the social issues related to this election have been overlooked. Please take the time to read this letter. Obama's position on abortion is clearly documented in his voting record in the Illinois senate. There is no way to argue on which side he stands. This is a letter written by a black concert pianist who resides in Illinois...he has seen Obama in action for the past two years in his own state. Please take the time to read this. And most importantly please pray for our nation.

Dear Friends,

A few months ago I was asked for my perspective on Obama, I sent out an email
with a few points. With the election just around the corner I decided to
complete my perspective. Those of you on my e-list have seen some of this
before but it's worth repeating...
First I must say whoever wins the election will have my prayer support. Obama
needs to be commended for his accomplishments but I need to explain why I
will not be voting for him.
Many of my friends process their identity through their blackness. I process
my identity through Christ. Being a Christian (a Christ follower) means He
leads I follow. I can't dictate the terms He does because He is the leader.
I can't vote black because I am black; I have to vote Christian because
that's who I am. Christian first, black second. Neither should anyone from
the other ethnic groups vote because of ethnicity. 200 years from now I won't
be asked if I was black or white. I will be asked if I knew Jesus and
accepted Him as Lord and Savior.
In an election there are many issues to consider but when a society gets
abortion, same-sex marriage, embryonic stem-cell research, human cloning to
name a few, wrong economic concerns will soon not matter.
We need to follow Martin Luther King's words, don't judge someone by the
color of their skin but by the content of their character. I don't know Obama
so all I can go off is his voting record. His voting record earned him the
title of the most liberal senator in the US Senate in 2007.
NATIONAL JOURNAL: Obama: Most Liberal Senator in 2007 (01/31/2008)
<NATIONAL JOURNAL: Obama: Most Liberal Senator in 2007 (01/31/2008)>
To beat Ted Kennedy and Hilary Clinton as the most liberal senator, takes
some doing . Obama accomplished this feat in 2 short years. I wonder what
would happen to America if he had four years to work with.
There is a reason Planned Parenthood gives him a 100 % rating.
There is a reason the homosexual community supports him.
There is a reason Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Castro, Hamas etc. love him.
There is a reason he said he would nominate liberal judges to the Supreme
Court. There is a reason he voted against the infanticide bill.
There is a reason he voted No on the constitutional ban of same-sex marriage.
There is a reason he voted No on banning partial birth abortion. There is a
reason he voted No on confirming Justices Roberts and Alito. These two judges
are conservatives and they have since overturned partial birth abortion. The
same practice Obama wanted to continue.
Let's take a look at the practice he wanted to continue
The 5 Step Partial Birth Abortion procedures:
A. Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist grabs the baby's leg with forceps.
(Remember this is a live baby)
B. The baby's leg is pulled out into the birth canal.
C. The abortionist delivers the baby's entire body, except for the head.
D. The abortionist jams scissors into the baby's skull. The scissors are then
opened to enlarge the hole.
E. The scissors are removed and a suction catheter is inserted. The child's
brains are sucked out, causing the skull to collapse. The dead baby is then
removed. ;
God help him.
There is a reason Obama opposed the parental notification law.

Think about this: You can't give a kid an aspirin without parental
notification but that same kid can have an abortion without parental
notification. This is insane.
There is a reason he went to Jeremiah Wright's church for 20 years.

Obama tells us he has good judgment but he sat under Jeremiah Wright teaching
for 20 years. Now he is condemning Wright's sermons. I wonder why now?
Obama said Jeremiah Wright led him to the Lord and discipled him. A disciple
is one in training. Jesus told us in Matthew 28:19 - 20 'Go and make
disciples of all nations.' This means reproduce yourself. Teach people to
think like you, walk like you; talk like you believe what you believe etc.
The question I have is what did Jeremiah Wright teach him?
Would you support a White President who went to a church which has tenets
that said they have a
1. Commitment to the White Community
2. Commitment to the White Family
3. Adherence to the White Work Ethic
4. Pledge to make the fruits of all developing and acquired skills available
to the White Community.
5. Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for
Strengthening and Supporting White Institutions
6. Pledge allegiance to all White leadership who espouse and embrace the
White Value System
7. Personal commitment to embracement of the White Value System.
Would you support a President who went to a church like that?
Just change the word from white to black and you have the tenets of Obama's
former church. If President Bush was a member of a church like this, he
would be called a racist. Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton would have been
marching outside.
This kind of church is a racist church. Obama did not wake up after 20 years
and just discovered he went to a racist church.. The church can't be about
race. Jesus did not come for any particular race. He came for the whole
world.
A church can't have a value system based on race. The churches value system
has to be based on biblical mandate. It does not matter if it's a white
church or a black church it's still wrong. Anyone from either race that
attends a church like this would never get my vote.
Obama's former Pastor Jeremiah Wright is a disciple of liberal theologian
James Cone, author of the 1970 book A Black Theology of Liberation. Cone once
wrote: 'Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally
with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white
people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him.
Cone is the man Obama's mentor looks up to. Does Obama believe this?
So what does all this mean for the nation?
In the past when the Lord bro ught someone with the beliefs of Obama to lead a
nation it meant one thing - judgment.
Read 1 Samuel 8 when Israel asked for a king. First God says in 1 Samuel 1:9
'Now listen to them; but warn them solemnly and let them know what the king
who will reign over them will do.'
Then God says
1 Samuel 1:18 ' When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the
king you have chosen, and the LORD will not answer you in that day.' 19 But
the people refused to listen to Samuel. 'No!' they said. 'We want a king over
us. 20 Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and
to go out before us and fight our battles.' 21 When Samuel heard all that
the people said, he repeated it before the LORD. 22 The LORD answered,
'Listen to them and give them a king.'
Here is what we know for sure.
God is not schizophrenic
He would not tell one person to vote for Obama and one to vote for McCain. As
the scripture says, a city divided against itself cannot stand, so obviously
many people are not hearing from God.
Maybe I am the one not hearing but I know God does not change and Obama
contradicts many things I read in scripture so I doubt it.
For all my friends who are voting for Obama can you really look God in the
face and say; Father based on your word, I am voting for Obama even though I
know he will continue the genocidal practice of partial birth abortion. He
might have to nominate three or four Supreme Court justices, and I am sure he
will be nominating liberal judges who will be making laws that are against
you. I also know he will continue to push for homosexual rights, even though
you destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for this. I know I can look the other way
because of the economy.
I could not see Jesus agreeing with many of Obama's positions. Finally I have
two questions for all my liberal friends.
Since we know someone's value system has to be placed on the nation,
1. Whose value system should be placed on the nation.
2. Who should determine that this is the right value system for the nation?
Blessings,
Huntley Brown
 
#6
#6
I say he is right on target. We have to be concerned with character first. Obama does not possess the character needed to be president.
 
#7
#7
No new reading needed. He is a socialist leaning empty suit that makes friends with terrorists and racists. Not sure why it has gotten as far as it has.
 
#8
#8
That is Pathetic. I've been a Repub my whole life, but this kind of crap disgusts me.

It is a shame....Historically, whenever people want to find a reason to verbally damn people, the bible is the first thing they grab to point out how right they are.
 
#9
#9
I say he is right on target. We have to be concerned with character first. Obama does not possess the character needed to be president.
I bet you're one of those people who get caught up in all the talking points (gays, abortions, Jesus) right? The Republican party doesn't offer solutions anymore and why would they when they can get mindless votes by bringing up these kind of things.
 
#11
#11
We have to be concerned with character first. Obama does not possess the character needed to be president.

I disagree with this. Bush has all the character in the world. He twice got elected on the "Who would you rather have a beer with" question and his faith in Jesus. Look how that turned out.

Character is important, but I say intelligence and judgement should come first.
 
#13
#13
Invoking the Bible and saying that homosexuals and Iran support him, and you expect us to believe that you don't personally adhere to that anti-Christ email you posted?
 
#14
#14
Read this article, and then lets talk about character.
Make-Believe Maverick : Rolling Stone

Who knows how much of this article is true, but if it's true i don't see how anyone could vote for McCain.

With all due respect there is a reason you find this article only in RS. It is as much garbage as the magazine itself is. Anyone who reads this mag for news on current events is either a child or has the intellect of a child.

If a quarter of the things listed in this article are true then serious journalists would have picked it up and run it long before RS did.
 
#15
#15
This thread is exactly the reason our country doesn't need to move further to the right. Just as Colin Powell stated this past Sunday.
 
#16
#16
This thread is exactly the reason our country doesn't need to move further to the right. Just as Colin Powell stated this past Sunday.

This country was much further right when Clinton was in office than it is today my friend! At least as far as leadership goes.
 
#17
#17
This country was much further right when Clinton was in office than it is today my friend! At least as far as leadership goes.

I totally disagree. In the past eight years, we have elected a president because he wasn't "going to take any sh-t from anyone" and his faith and morals as a Christian. He didn't win based on his stance on any real issues, other than abortion and gun control. When Clinton left office, this country was in the center, not the right.
 
#18
#18
I totally disagree. In the past eight years, we have elected a president because he wasn't "going to take any sh-t from anyone" and his faith and morals as a Christian. He didn't win based on his stance on any real issues, other than abortion and gun control. When Clinton left office, this country was in the center, not the right.


Bush gave lip service to real issues (ie smaller government, reduced spending, humble foreign policy) but never put any of it into practice.

I don't think it matters whether we were further right or center under Clinton. I do think Clinton was more of a centrist than Bush is.
 
#19
#19
Bush gave lip service to real issues (ie smaller government, reduced spending, humble foreign policy) but never put any of it into practice.

I don't think it matters whether we were further right or center under Clinton. I do think Clinton was more of a centrist than Bush is.

I think the repub majority kept him centered. My point about the leadership being further right has more to do with the people in that majority at the time.

Your last point is true Bush has not been conservative at all!
 
#20
#20
I totally disagree. In the past eight years, we have elected a president because he wasn't "going to take any sh-t from anyone" and his faith and morals as a Christian. He didn't win based on his stance on any real issues, other than abortion and gun control. When Clinton left office, this country was in the center, not the right.

Wan't it the republican majority that kept him centered by balance for the most part?
 
#23
#23
Wan't it the republican majority that kept him centered by balance for the most part?

Exactly. Fortunately, the fact we had a republican president AND Congress for six years didn't push us too far to the right. This country could have gotten ultra conservative( :wacko: ), but I certainly think the wars swayed the focus in that area .
 
#24
#24
Exactly. Fortunately, the fact we had a republican president AND Congress for six years didn't push us too far to the right. This country could have gotten ultra conservative( :wacko: ), but I certainly think the wars swayed the focus in that area .

The country needs to stay in the middle........

The silent majority will wake up one day and tell these hacks on the right and left to go away.
 
#25
#25
Exactly. Fortunately, the fact we had a republican president AND Congress for six years didn't push us too far to the right. This country could have gotten ultra conservative( :wacko: ), but I certainly think the wars swayed the focus in that area .
on which agenda item did the country move too far right over those 6 years? Which single one? Can you even name one? Do you have any idea?
 

VN Store



Back
Top