hatvol96
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 49,979
- Likes
- 18
Anyone who thinks the majority of players weren't dirty from the mid '90s til legit testing was instituted is being willfully blind or is really, really soft mentally.The people who thought I was crazy were more objecting to me implying that juicing was so widespread. I'm no Jose Conseco, but it seems like the drastic shift in the game indicates it WAS.
Not signing Harper would be a terrible mistake IMO. You would get a guy like Cole or Purke as compensation, but neither of those guys are talents like Harper is (not a knock on those 2 BTW).Didn't quite wanna start a thread for this...
Bryce Harper coming down to the wire, as expected. As a nationals fan, I adore the potential there. Without signing him, we'd get our pick of Gerrit Cole and Matt Purke next year, as well as a top ten pick. We'll see how everything works out, but not signing him has a decent alternative.
Not signing Harper would be a terrible mistake IMO. You would get a guy like Cole or Purke as compensation, but neither of those guys are talents like Harper is (not a knock on those 2 BTW).
The game is definitely a lot more recognizable for those of us that grew up watching baseball prior to the mid 90s. I can remember when 30 HRs defined a very good power hitter and getting to 40 was considered freakish.I would much rather watch 3-2 game then a slugfest.
I like that the game is getting back to normal...jut look at HR totals, it's amazing how they have fallen( as far as the leaders go anyhow ).