I am going to go be productive, but my final thoughts on this cycle are these.
Heup is a relational HC. He is loyal to both coaches and players invested in his program and vision. Maybe sometimes to a fault, but it builds trust and minimizes drama. Pope, Alec, and Milton are all potential examples of this, both good and bad. Where Heupel does get aggressive is in his play, and to that end he has more than shown a willingness to retool or rethink. Look no further than our rushing attack this year when Joe and receivers struggled. The A&M victory may be one of his best, because it fit his style least. All of this to say, Heupel is methodical and thoughtful.
That methodology has meant we don't go all in unless there is a direct relation to the strategic vision.
Those have been:
QB (Nico & Merklinger), Play Makers (Matthews & Staley), Protection (Covid Seniors & Warren) & Disrupters (Pearce & Ross)
That strategic vision also looks not just at one aspect of recruiting but balancing all three. Look no further than the DB room these last few weeks. A DB room that many maligned he managed to upgrade in one portal rotation. He did so by making the hard choices many say he is incapable of and recruiting portal guys many said he was incapable of landing.
In conclusion Heupel is playing chess and many of us are looking at checkers. It is natural because for most of us it is not our job, our greatest strength, or we just don't have the same vision of success.
I do not know if Heupel will win it all here, but like Fulmer he is doing it his way. Fulmer had many flaws, but he was true to himself, and he was also loyal to a fault. He was relational, and he was passionate about line play and recruiting. They may be completely different individuals, but if we stop picking apart the flaws we might start to see some really fun similarities.
It is a new world, we have some advantages and disadvantages in this new dynamic, but IMO Heup is bringing new life and new ideas that just might see us to the top.