I think to me the boiled down version, if I understand the deets.
Punishing my dog for eating the Cat Food two years after it happens, is confusing as hell.
We did what we thought was right according to our lawyers, at that time. You cannot modify the rules of a sport and retroactively enforce them.
If they're saying we broke impermissible benefits. We can easily show singling out, a history of cooperation, self implemented punishments, and absolute helter skelter enforcement.
This is NOTHING short of an example being made of the one school that cooperated. We ARE being punished for cooperating and because the NCAA is so inconceivably bad at their jobs, they try to show their teeth to only those that play ball.
It is my sincere hope that courts look at the body of our compliance, and look at the NCAA as the near defunct organization it is. NCAA is more concerned with itself, and us have our kids' best interests ahead of our own.
This is about retribution for not getting the desired sentence previously, about its incompetence in not seeing NIL & doing anything about it, and setting an example to others. Its a witchhunt, and we are the bait.
Tennessee has made this rightly about the SA, and less about them. That is their ace.