Maybe it's BVS, or maybe it's my lack of trust in the AA being able to be reasonable, but I'm not so sure this is over.
What I've seen from Corker's ruling (haven't read the whole thing), is that they can't enforce any NIL rules.
However, according to reports, the biggest thing they were coming after us for was Spyre giving Nico a free flight to UT on a private jet. In their eyes, Spyre is a booster, so that's not allowed. That's not an NIL thing.
I realize they may lose that argument also, but might they still come after us, out of spite if nothing else? I see nothing that this ruling addresses collectives as boosters.
Other than what we want to believe, show me where this ain't gonna happen.