Recruiting Football Talk VIII

I think that’s one interpretation of it. But the section that reads “adjudge and decree that the [NCAA’s] competition limitations…violates the Sherman Anti-Trust Act” sure sounds like it would set a precedent that eligibility limitations in general is an anti-trust violation.

Regardless, it’s dumb. Pavia doesn’t need 2 extra years of eligibility. Enough with the ******** of 25-29 year old college players.
I agree. It would be a step closer to unlimited eligibility
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volunteer821

VN Store



Back
Top