RiseToTheTop
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2013
- Messages
- 24,767
- Likes
- 40,152
I agree. It would be a step closer to unlimited eligibilityI think that’s one interpretation of it. But the section that reads “adjudge and decree that the [NCAA’s] competition limitations…violates the Sherman Anti-Trust Act” sure sounds like it would set a precedent that eligibility limitations in general is an anti-trust violation.
Regardless, it’s dumb. Pavia doesn’t need 2 extra years of eligibility. Enough with the ******** of 25-29 year old college players.