pismonque
Bury me in Orcadian peat
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2009
- Messages
- 5,555
- Likes
- 13,364
Yes, but playing devil's advocate, there also is a long-established spelling of a word that you're now changing on the basis of a common misspelling combined with current cultural ubiquity. So in that regard it's no different than accepting "irregardless". You're canonizing ignorance.I'm with her on this one. An interesting argument.
Considering the dictionary was made through crowd sourcing... Your argument is also just crowd sourcing mixed with an appeal to authority, the latter of which is a logical fallacy.
If she can show (or at least approximately show) that most people are using or spelling a word differently than what is in the dictionary, then the dictionary is the one that is wrong.
If it worked the other way, there would never be a reason to release new versions of a dictionary.
Of course, that happens all the time and has been for ages. It also is wobbly to be dogmatic about the spelling of a word whose linguistic rules are archaic anyway. I mean, it's a 4-letter word with two silent letters anyway.
But if we're crowdsourcing a change, I'd much rather see "wo" rather than a dumb transposition of letters that makes me feel like it should rhyme with Noah.
G**d*** I sound like an uppity snob lol. I actually don't really even mind it, it's just another amusing weirdness of 21st century life.