AD over Jokic is a joke.
Must be.
3x MVP vs...a very good player.
5-yr PER avg of 32 vs 25.5...
It's not close.
Top-3 (if not #1) vs maybe (probably?) borderline top-10.
Jokic is the best player in basketball. His defense is not bad at all.I will admit in their head to head playoff matchups recently Jokic has dominated AD. But in terms of overall impact I would still prefer having an elite two way big like AD on my team than the defensive liability that is Jokic.
I think it's easier to build a championship team around AD than Jokic. I also think you can add AD to more teams and they instantly get better versus Jokic whose lack of defense would be problematic.
Must be.
3x MVP vs...a very good player.
5-yr PER avg of 32 vs 25.5...
It's not close.
Top-3 (if not #1) vs maybe (probably?) borderline top-10.
Jokic is the best player in basketball. His defense is not bad at all.
Yeah AD would be better than the most efficient/skilled big man in the history of basketball
Jokic is the best player in basketball. His defense is not bad at all.
Yeah AD would be better than the most efficient/skilled big man in the history of basketball
AD can’t carry a team. Jokic can. Your point is completely invalidI will admit in their head to head playoff matchups recently Jokic has dominated AD. But in terms of overall impact I would still prefer having an elite two way big like AD on my team than the defensive liability that is Jokic.
I think it's easier to build a championship team around AD than Jokic. I also think you can add AD to more teams and they instantly get better versus Jokic whose lack of defense would be problematic.
AD can’t carry a team. Jokic can. Your point is completely invalid