Yeah, I wouldn’t have missed Awaka at all if Estrella was healthy. Dubar has let my expectations tho. Great shot blocker that throws down some sweet oops and plays tough despite his slender frame. He’s also less foul prone than Awaka was/is, not that it means much.I know Dubar had some terrible family issues but he's really struggled. Awaka was a favorite of mine so I'm looking at it emotionally.
*Obviously, Estrella getting hurt wasn't part of the plan.
correctBlame it on Sally when we all know it was @Weezer
No. Too many coaches play too many guys. Smaller rotations are better. I've always hated coaches running 10-11 mam rotations.Two basketball things:
1) Coach Kim Caldwell is a helluva coach and has the chance to be the best young coach in the nation with a few more seasons. She already has signed a Dawn Staley type of class, which should make next season fun along with a top flight transfer.
2) If Coach Barnes wins it all with what is basically a 8 man rotation will that be the greatest coaching job ever? Certainly my life time, and it’s very possible. I really believe we can beat both Kentucky and Houston, as long as Chaz don’t have an off night like a few times in conference play.
And OSU hadn’t lost at home all year!You aren’t wrong, but you also have to factor in that KH in her Sweet 16 runs never beat a major conference team. Mid majors both times. KC beat a major conference team on its home floor tonight with what may realistically be one of her least talented rosters at Tennessee.
Why? The system clearly works. She gave numerous top teams all they wanted this year with way less talent and beat UConn. Keep doing it with more talent and start winning those games.Once the talent increases, the volatility should go down. Although she coaches like Pearl and his teams still have that same volatility.
Theoretically, because chaotic systems like hers tend to raise your ceiling and lower your floor. So you make a game like UConn winnable, but you also make yourself vulnerable to losing to 13-19 Georgia at home.Why? The system clearly works. She gave numerous top teams all they wanted this year with way less talent and beat UConn. Keep doing it with more talent and start winning those games.
I don't believe CKC will let off the gas in the future seasons but as the talent brought in gets stronger, I believe these 40 second subs will slow down.Theoretically, because chaotic systems like hers tend to raise your ceiling and lower your floor. So you make a game like UConn winnable, but you also make yourself vulnerable to losing to 13-19 Georgia at home.
So, the question posed is, once she gets top-level talent and has less of a need to raise the ceiling of her team, will she adjust her system to make it less susceptible to upsets? I’m not advocating for it or against it, I’m just curious to see whether it happens.
I’m not saying it’s a bad thing. Just that a fast-paced, quick shot, 40 minutes of hell type of scheme has its ups and downs. It’s only going to get better with more consistent talent and more years together as a team.Why? The system clearly works. She gave numerous top teams all they wanted this year with way less talent and beat UConn. Keep doing it with more talent and start winning those games.