Ulysees E. McGill
This season is for you Sweets
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 54,424
- Likes
- 142,891
See my post to shoney. It could be done all the same to get mid range shots, which almost everyone in the league can hit now.True, though that was a rare team built essentially around getting everyone 3s, so motion and screens were very necessary. Some of that was cut when Durant joined. But most teams aren't built that way. Almost like Duke teams of past.
That’s because it’s the original! I still use franks, but more as a foundation. I’ll put it on the stove, add butter, then maybe siracha, or some Cully’s Fire Water, or Da Bomb or anything I want. Sometimes I go just straight Fire Water or other sauces, but I still love the traditions buffalo taste, just kicked up many many Notches on the heat. I like that capsaicin sweat and high!Nothing towards you, of course, but man am I sick of Franks. It's like that's the only thing that gets used now to make something "buffalo".
These kids like hank talking about how defense is good now but it's just harder.
Hank and 99% of the nba be like
View attachment 260872
They've always been able to shoot lol they've just added an extra shooter (talking about how most PF are now more of a second SF). It's still not fun basketball. Hardly any movement. Iso ball or pick and rolls make up like 95% of the league. It's a bore until the intensity ratchets up in the playoffs.Sorry players can actually shoot now......
They could, but is there a per-shot advantage in doing so? I have no idea and am not privy to basketball analytics, but have usually understood driving (layup/dunk/getting fouled/kick out) and 3 pointers (1.5x value that of a jump shot ofc) to be the most valuable plays. This range-merging would also not seem to stress defenses as much as a strategy of "polarizing ranges".See my post to shoney. It could be done all the same to get mid range shots, which almost everyone in the league can hit now.
Hank says everyone can shoot now so why don't they run those offenses?They could, but is there a per-shot advantage in doing so? I have no idea and am not privy to basketball analytics, but have usually understood driving (layup/dunk/getting fouled/kick out) and 3 pointers (1.5x value that of a jump shot ofc) to be the most valuable plays. This range-merging would also not seem to stress defenses as much as a strategy of "polarizing ranges".
Better to hit 3s than 2s, given the dropoff in % isn't enough to offset the point differential. 3s also create better offensive rebound opportunities and spreads the defense. I just don't see any advantage to shooting long 2s.Hank says everyone can shoot now so why don't they run those offenses?
Well, we could proceed to get into how I hate the defensive rules and how the emphasis on the 3pt shot is a product of certain rule changes, but...They could, but is there a per-shot advantage in doing so? I have no idea and am not privy to basketball analytics, but have usually understood driving (layup/dunk/getting fouled/kick out) and 3 pointers (1.5x value that of a jump shot ofc) to be the most valuable plays. This range-merging would also not seem to stress defenses as much as a strategy of "polarizing ranges".