Recruiting Forum Football Talk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
#137,804
#137,804
Glitch said:
Along the lines of naming kids, my wife fully planned on naming our second daughter Lola. We had adopted her niece and she thought it was the most awful name for a little girl. It was around that time that we decided to get a kitten from the animal shelter. Our niece asked if she could name the kitten. My wife agreed and our niece immediately named the cat Lola. Lol. Can't name your daughter after the cat!
Click to expand...
My wife is all of about 5 feet, maybe 5'1. I just know if we have a son he will be short. So I've always wanted to give him the middle name of "Skyscraper". I think a short boy with the name Skyscraper would just be tremendous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLSONLY, InVOLuntary, OrangeGlasses731 and 4 others
#137,814
#137,814
coskramer said:
Shut up Lebron Fans

View attachment 279766
Click to expand...
MJ is the goat, but holy lord that is some obvious cherry picking. LBJ career points/attempt is actually higher. But the reason it is cherry picking is pretty clear -

1) LBJ takes way more 3s. MJ hardly took them, thus raising his FG% relative to LBJ. That is why there is a stat, eFG%. Going by this, LBJ has shot over 49% all but 1 season his entire career. MJ was over 49% 9/15 seasons.

2) He's bringing up total points scored, when MJ clearly shot more than LBJ. He had about 3.5 more shots/game. LBJ's career point/shot is right at 1.0, so if you gave him the same shot attempts as MJ, that takes him from 2 seasons over 30 ppg, to TWELVE. If he had just shot more and passed less... Which brings up another cherry picking point, 30 is an arbitrary number.

The only stat that really captures the effectiveness of a scorer is total points (including FTs) per attempts and they are both at the top all-time around ~1.0. Iirc LBJ is sliiightly higher. We'll see if he can maintain that if he decides to play into his declining years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackLabelVols, nicksjuzunk and screenthis
#137,819
#137,819
Geaux_Vols said:
this so ****ing embarrassing.

Click to expand...


200.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsDoc81TX, VOLSONLY, joceppyjoe and 4 others
#137,820
#137,820
Saw his on UGA board running off their mouths about us.

For the most part Tennessee has been fecal matter since the sport integrated in the early 1970's. They had a nice run from 89-01 because Georgia, Clemson, LSU and Alabama (for the latter half of that run) were all simultaneously down with bad coaches which allowed UTjr to recruit above their heads for that period. Otherwise, all of their glory is in the distant segregated past. In the modern era, being dog ***** is not an anomaly for the Tennessee football program, it's their natural state.

1980 Dawgs!:cool:

VFL...GBO
 
  • Like
Reactions: #Vol4Life1991
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top