nate from decatur
Naterfromdecatur
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2016
- Messages
- 189
- Likes
- 477
Our TE's were terrible. Then we moved our TE coach to ILB's as if that is a logical thing, and then they are terrible.If it is as bad towards Neids as the rumor.... i don’t see how the head coach couldn’t be ultimately held responsible.
Agree.. except, maybe it was never their intent to fire Pruitt but something in the LEAKED investigation forces them to do so.I’d rather not be busted for violations at all. If we were gonna fire Pruitt, we should have done it after the TAMU game. Dragging this out makes us look like a-holes playing checkers.
I paid him a compliment. He's hip and woke.@Freak ,@InVOLuntary is talking behind your back again.
Based on his actions I don't believe that so much.Got a friend somewhat in the know that still says he’s been told he’ll be fired. I just don’t see it at this point
Yeah.I’d rather not be busted for violations at all. If we were gonna fire Pruitt, we should have done it after the TAMU game. Dragging this out makes us look like a-holes playing checkers.
So Hooker and Salter won't be given a real chance unless HB falters in practice? The thing about Hooker and Salter, even Maurer if he sticks, is they need to be in game situations to shine (like Dobbs).QB is still HB's job to lose. Depth behind him is better than last year.
I don't believe that they wanted to fire Pruitt after TAMU, and they are using this investigation to dodge the buyout. I don't.I’d rather not be busted for violations at all. If we were gonna fire Pruitt, we should have done it after the TAMU game. Dragging this out makes us look like a-holes playing checkers.