Ulysees E. McGill
This season is for you Sweets
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 54,424
- Likes
- 142,891
Joe O has an in with JUCO guys.. I think that is where we are going to have to live this upcoming spring to fill out our roster, and he could play a key role. Just playing devil's advocateI don’t understand the Osovet love. He has done nothing here. I would rather bring in a whole new staff and ones that have worked together to get this thing rolling. UCF offensive staff + new DC who gets to pick his defensive hires to coach that side up.
I don’t understand the Osovet love. He has done nothing here. I would rather bring in a whole new staff and ones that have worked together to get this thing rolling. UCF offensive staff + new DC who gets to pick his defensive hires to coach that side up.
Also seemed kinda like and outsider on the past staff. Maybe he fits better on this one. I have no issues with him remaining.Joe O has an in with JUCO guys.. I think that is where we are going to have to live this upcoming spring to fill out our roster, and he could play a key role. Just playing devil's advocate
Exactly------scoring TD's in 2 minute increments is much better than going 3 and out in 2 minute incrementsPeople are saying Heupel’s style of offense hurts the defense because of the amount of time the defense is on the field. While this may be true, our offense was so bad last year that the defense was on the field far more than they should have been. This won’t be anything new for our defense, we’ll just have more points this time.
No SEC East teams, no Bama, no Ole Miss(because I don't want Kiffin getting him)
And no Oklahoma.
Thank you. I call it like I see it, and if the facts don't support an opinion, they don't support it. I think the Chancellor did a commendable job running the search professionally and having a contingency plan. I think she made a sound AD hire, and I think she's giving him the support and time he needs to make the changes required. I've commented multiple times on those things. Seeing both sides of something or someone doesn't fit some agendas, though.
We are going to be just fine at running back.
Smaller backs:
Small (193lbs)
Wright (185lbs)
Bigger backs:
Evans (215lbs)
Brown (217lbs)
Hodge (216lbs)
Possible backs:
Beckwith (215)
Whitehead (230)
[Weights according to recruiting page]
Small and Evans are the only ones with some college experience, so it's hard to know what we have. But we have depth. I think Heupel will scheme around the best players at the position.
How many total college carries among the whole group? Less than 20?We are going to be just fine at running back.
Smaller backs:
Small (193lbs)
Wright (185lbs)
Bigger backs:
Evans (215lbs)
Brown (217lbs)
Hodge (216lbs)
Possible backs:
Beckwith (215)
Whitehead (230)
[Weights according to recruiting page]
Small and Evans are the only ones with some college experience, so it's hard to know what we have. But we have depth. I think Heupel will scheme around the best players at the position.
Obviously just now seeing Brown wants out of his NLI. That's fine, I still think we have plenty of depth and talent at the position. I'd be more worried about getting additions to the defensive side of the ball.We are going to be just fine at running back.
Smaller backs:
Small (193lbs)
Wright (185lbs)
Bigger backs:
Evans (215lbs)
Brown (217lbs)
Hodge (216lbs)
Possible backs:
Beckwith (215)
Whitehead (230)
[Weights according to recruiting page]
Small and Evans are the only ones with some college experience, so it's hard to know what we have. But we have depth. I think Heupel will scheme around the best players at the position.