Recruiting Forum Football Talk III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mrs. Ekeler walks in the door, and Mike be like....

iu
😂 looks like we get to welcome Neyland Ekeler to the world in about 9 months.
 
Because I want to see a commitment to winning from the admin. I don't have another unproven coach hired here in 4 years. When consumers stop purchasing an inferior product, the company has to change it's strategy in order to survive.
Sounds like you need to find another team to support, or you are a pompous arrogant know-it-all. Either way, so glad Benjamin Franklin invented the ignore button.
 
These are the drives by QB for the spring game. I’ve scored the drives according to the defense that was on the field. Vince Ferrara provided the matchups. If the QB faced the #1 defense then all scoring is normal, i.e., a TD is 7 pts and a FG is 3 pts. If the QB faced the #2 defense, a TD was only worth 5 pts and if the QB faced the #3 defense a TD was only worth 3 pts. It didn’t matter which offense was on the field.

Orange shading is for the #1 units, Yellow for #2 units, and pink for #3 units.

It looks like Bailey was the only QB who had a TD drive with the #2 offense against the #1 defense. Of course Hooker did have a TD in the same matchup but it was a pick six so probably not really what we’re looking for. jmo.

Bailey had 3 drives with the #1 offense, Hooker had 2 and Brian had 1. Brian had 3 drives with the #2 offense, Hooker had 2 and Bailey had 1. Brian had 2 drives with the #3 offense, and Hooker, Bailey, and Spencer each had 1.

Brian had 6 total drives. Bailey and Hooker had 5 each and Spencer had 1.

It’s almost like Heupel was trying to make Bailey look good but given that he only faced the #1 defense once and that with the #2 offense for a TD drive, Heupel may have also been trying to not make the #1 defense look too bad. jmo.

If Vince’s data is right, I’m not sure how we discount Bailey’s performance. I’m working on it but so far the only thing I have is some opinions. The folks looking at the data suggest that the Kid’s performance was real. jmo.

ScreenHunter 748.png
 
These are the drives by QB for the spring game. I’ve scored the drives according to the defense that was on the field. Vince Ferrara provided the matchups. If the QB faced the #1 defense then all scoring is normal, i.e., a TD is 7 pts and a FG is 3 pts. If the QB faced the #2 defense, a TD was only worth 5 pts and if the QB faced the #3 defense a TD was only worth 3 pts. It didn’t matter which offense was on the field.

Orange shading is for the #1 units, Yellow for #2 units, and pink for #3 units.

It looks like Bailey was the only QB who had a TD drive with the #2 offense against the #1 defense. Of course Hooker did have a TD in the same matchup but it was a pick six so probably not really what we’re looking for. jmo.

Bailey had 3 drives with the #1 offense, Hooker had 2 and Brian had 1. Brian had 3 drives with the #2 offense, Hooker had 2 and Bailey had 1. Brian had 2 drives with the #3 offense, and Hooker, Bailey, and Spencer each had 1.

Brian had 6 total drives. Bailey and Hooker had 5 each and Spencer had 1.

It’s almost like Heupel was trying to make Bailey look good but given that he only faced the #1 defense once and that with the #2 offense for a TD drive, Heupel may have also been trying to not make the #1 defense look too bad. jmo.

If Vince’s data is right, I’m not sure how we discount Bailey’s performance. I’m working on it but so far the only thing I have is some opinions. The folks looking at the data suggest that the Kid’s performance was real. jmo.

View attachment 364661
@sjt18
 
There is a great argument to be made that David Blackburn should have been hired over Currie and, subsequently, Fulmer.

Danny White was, by leaps and bounds, a better candidate than Blackburn this time around. They're not even in the same conversation.

I believe Blackburn has some skeletons in the closet which is why he is where he is now
 
I believe Blackburn has some skeletons in the closet which is why he is where he is now
100%.

I like David a lot. I have family who grew up with his family in Loudon. They all say great things.

But he burned some bridges on the way out at UTC. I would expect he's next in line at MTSU or some smaller school in-state.
 
Middleton has been in school for a long time. He debated coming back for an extra year. He was close to HT and QC, and all three were unhappy about the way things went down with Pruitt and the former staff. He seemed all-in, then started skipping things. QC did that for a while, too.

Hate to say it, but the adage...."once a knucklehead, always a knucklehead" comes to mind. We've heard stories about him for years.
 
Hate to say it, but the adage...."once a knucklehead, always a knucklehead" comes to mind. We've heard stories about him for years.

We need him. But players acting like they can pick and choose what to do or opt in and out at will seldom works out. The sooner all those that are thinking about leaving get both feet in or out the door, the better.
 
These are the drives by QB for the spring game. I’ve scored the drives according to the defense that was on the field. Vince Ferrara provided the matchups. If the QB faced the #1 defense then all scoring is normal, i.e., a TD is 7 pts and a FG is 3 pts. If the QB faced the #2 defense, a TD was only worth 5 pts and if the QB faced the #3 defense a TD was only worth 3 pts. It didn’t matter which offense was on the field.

Orange shading is for the #1 units, Yellow for #2 units, and pink for #3 units.

It looks like Bailey was the only QB who had a TD drive with the #2 offense against the #1 defense. Of course Hooker did have a TD in the same matchup but it was a pick six so probably not really what we’re looking for. jmo.

Bailey had 3 drives with the #1 offense, Hooker had 2 and Brian had 1. Brian had 3 drives with the #2 offense, Hooker had 2 and Bailey had 1. Brian had 2 drives with the #3 offense, and Hooker, Bailey, and Spencer each had 1.

Brian had 6 total drives. Bailey and Hooker had 5 each and Spencer had 1.

It’s almost like Heupel was trying to make Bailey look good but given that he only faced the #1 defense once and that with the #2 offense for a TD drive, Heupel may have also been trying to not make the #1 defense look too bad. jmo.

If Vince’s data is right, I’m not sure how we discount Bailey’s performance. I’m working on it but so far the only thing I have is some opinions. The folks looking at the data suggest that the Kid’s performance was real. jmo.

View attachment 364661

Thanks. The data supports it and so do my eyes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top