MidTennVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
- Messages
- 56
- Likes
- 264
Impact is...Hurd carried for fewer yards per carry and received for fewer yards per reception than even Ty Chandler. His TD rate was once every 25 touches vs Chandler's one in 29. Because Hurd was a goalline type and Chandler had carries taken away near the goalline. Guess we could call all that even...and this is just comparing to Ty Chandler...far from a great...Kamara was clearly better, Dobbs was also better, Gray was more productive while here, as were John Kelly, Cedric Houston, Raijon Neal, and Arian Foster (both rate and volume for Foster) - since 2001. Lane and Riggs too (per play, though they had quite low TD rates). Tauren Poole is tied. In fact, Poole is the closest comparison there is to Hurd.I'm not sure I agree totally. Hurd could do things Kamara couldnt. Hurd was a good rb, Kamara is a great RB. They should have found a way keep them all involved and had them on the field at the same time. Ty Chandler couldn't carry Hurds jock from a impact perspective.
Impact is...Hurd carried for fewer yards per carry and received for fewer yards per reception. His TD rate was once every 25 touches vs Chandler's one in 29. Because Hurd was a goalline type and Chandler had carries taken away near the goalline. And this is just comparing to Ty Chandler...far from a great...Kamara was clearly better, Dobbs was also better, Gray was more productive while here, as were John Kelly, Cedric Houston and Arian Foster (both rate and volume for Foster).
I think people just inflate what Hurd actually did because he so much looked the part. But he was never a top tier RB. Not a single season over even 5 ypc lol. And again by his JR year he was awful...3.7 ypc... It's just like the other myth always said by that bowl game announcer about how Hurd, being so big, would "lather up" as the game went on...but this was factually false. People just let their perceptions and false notions (big RBs wear defenses down and thus become better as the game goes along) run wild.
He was his freshman season. And no doubt Kamara was underutilized, but he wasn’t and has never been a workhorse. What made the SC game loss even worse after Hurd quit at halftime was Kamara being out after getting dinged up. Hurd did the heavy lifting in a scheme he didn’t fit.
Your false notion.... Record books say different. Gray does not touch Hurd, Kelly thats a negative too. Hurd was used as a bulldozer and quiet often was hit behind the line of scrimmage because we had terrible OL's. Quitting on his team was bad and I agree. But you are blowing smoke straight out your ass on this one. You can create bullsh1t stats to fit any agenda.Impact is...Hurd carried for fewer yards per carry and received for fewer yards per reception than even Ty Chandler. His TD rate was once every 25 touches vs Chandler's one in 29. Because Hurd was a goalline type and Chandler had carries taken away near the goalline. Guess we could call all that even...and this is just comparing to Ty Chandler...far from a great...Kamara was clearly better, Dobbs was also better, Gray was more productive while here, as were John Kelly, Cedric Houston and Arian Foster (both rate and volume for Foster) - since 2001.
I think people just inflate what Hurd actually did because he so much looked the part. But he was never a top tier RB. Not a single season over even 5 ypc lol. And again by his JR year he was awful...3.7 ypc... It's just like the other myth always said by that bowl game announcer about how Hurd, being so big, would "lather up" as the game went on...but this was factually false. People just let their perceptions and false notions (big RBs wear defenses down and thus become better as the game goes along) run wild.
I expect we’ll be seeing this ALOT this season. I can’t wait!!!
That's just volume though. Not efficient production. Would you think it would have been a smart thing to keep pounding Hurd at 3.7 YPC if it means he makes it to x number of career yards? Of course not. Running him that much wasn't a positive.Not sure what is so hard to understand. Think of the coaching he had to overcome to become the second leading rusher in UT history! He would have been UT's all time leading rusher by a mile had he not been lied too.
Hurd could do one thing. Take the ball a bully his way for 3-5 yards. That was about it from a running perspective. He certainly wasn't a big play threat. He benefited from a lack of rbs and coaches that underutilized a future All Pro in Kamara.I'm not sure I agree totally. Hurd could do things Kamara couldnt. Hurd was a good rb, Kamara is a great RB. They should have found a way keep them all involved and had them on the field at the same time. Ty Chandler couldn't carry Hurds jock from a impact perspective.
I remain convinced that DeBord wanted to implement a full season stretch of that small sample gameplan against Northwestern in the bowl game. Offset I mixed in with the spread. You could have fully utilized any of Hurd, Kamara or Kelly and prevented the defense from teeing off on Hurd with his slower initial burst. Butch reneged and we got maybe two plays out of it in 2016. Butch ended up losing both Hurd and DeBord and ultimately the team.One of the most annoying things about Butch was insisting on asking Hurd to run horizontal stretch plays off tackle. Didn’t have the Olinemen to make those plays, and it was obviously not Hurd’s strength. If they’d just used him one-cut downhill, both he and the offense would have so much more successful.
One of the most annoying things about Butch was insisting on asking Hurd to run horizontal stretch plays off tackle. Didn’t have the Olinemen to make those plays, and it was obviously not Hurd’s strength. If they’d just used him one-cut downhill, both he and the offense would have so much more successful.