Sleegro
5⭐❤, Champion of Life, Brick, Realist
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2010
- Messages
- 12,860
- Likes
- 38,005
Correct me if Im wrong, but doesnt only one FCS win count towards bowl eligibility? So one of those wins will basically be pointless.
This article is from Aug 2012 but I couldn't find anything about a rule change since then so this is the most recent thing I've found that actually explains it well. It's all kinda stupid anyway. They need to reduce bowls not give everybody one. But here is the explanation:
NCAA's new bowl game tiebreakers include FCS wins, 5-7 teams
Ordinarily, teams need to finish with a minimum .500 winning percentage with at least six wins -- five against other Football Bowl Subdivision teams -- to be bowl eligible. A sixth win against a Football Championship Subdivision team only counts if the FCS school meets scholarship requirements.
Now, first consideration will go to 6-6 teams with a win against any FCS teams, regardless of scholarships, then 6-6 teams with two wins against FCS schools.
A team that finishes 6-7 and loses in a conference championship would be next, followed by 6-7 teams that normally play a 13-team schedule, such as Hawaii and its home opponents.
Then bowls could then invite FCS teams making the move to FBS, if they have at least a 6-6 record.
Finally, a team with a top-five APR that finishes 5-7 could be selected.
So the way I read that is it will only affect them if they go 6-6 and there are enough 6-6 teams with 1 or less FCS win to push them out. Which there never are. So I seriously doubt this has any negative affect on either of them.