revjayp
👈🏼That’s my boy, Knox.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 5,107
- Likes
- 11,816
He clearly could have kept walking away, or not tried pushing the guy away that was trying to prevent the fight. If a woman yapping at you is enough to get you to put your hands on her, especially when you have millions of dollars on the line, then you're not much of a man. Plus he pushed that guy into her waaay harder than any hit he may have taken.I don't care one bit about him or the Chiefs. He shouldn't of lost his job over that. She hit him the hardest. She was no innocent bystander - she was obviously starting things verbally and would not walk away when Hunt even turned around and walk around the corner. She kept coming closer and mouthing off.
I didn't say it was, but we do have certain laws on the books to prevent people from inciting violence with rhetoric so its not like words don't have their place in these sorts of altercations. I'm just saying she wasn't some angel in the ordeal. We don't know what was said. Regardless, all he did was push her and tap her on the ass with his foot. She had numerous opportunities to walk away and she kept instigating things. Fault is on both parties."Mouthing off" isn't an invitation to violence.
Lol kress twitter warriors so dumb they get boyd tweeting to call them out. Should quiet the storm.
Another thought here is stuff like the haralson article could be BOT way of saying oh look we were against this so don't yell at us if it goes wrong just talk to Fulmer/Pruitt. Could be a media play to protect admin and let Fulmer/Pruitt take control as they should
I didn't say it was, but we do have certain laws on the books to prevent people from inciting violence with rhetoric so its not like words don't have their place in these sorts of altercations. I'm just saying she wasn't some angel in the ordeal. We don't know what was said. Regardless, all he did was push her and tap her on the ass with his foot. She had numerous opportunities to walk away and she kept instigating things. Fault is on both parties.
Yup, this is up to Pruitt.
Sure, Freeze is the biggest name out there, but any of Freeze, Lindsey, Enos, Kitchens would be fantastic snags, so I’ll trust Pruitt to do his due diligence and grab the guy that’s is the best fit.
That's what I said, not as a valid reason to fight someone, but just that the law does recognize in certain circumstances that words can lead to violence.Actually, we don’t. There are laws against inflammatory language that calls for violence or seeks to incite panic. There is nothing that gives credence to the idea that you can fight someone for something they say to you.
And he was the one with a lot to lose...and he did. Cautionary tale maybe the lucky bastajes with world class athletic talent will heed.I didn't say it was, but we do have certain laws on the books to prevent people from inciting violence with rhetoric so its not like words don't have their place in these sorts of altercations. I'm just saying she wasn't some angel in the ordeal. We don't know what was said. Regardless, all he did was push her and tap her on the ass with his foot. She had numerous opportunities to walk away and she kept instigating things. Fault is on both parties.