Recruiting Forum Football Talk V

Status
Not open for further replies.
#35,077
#35,077
Orangeredblooded said:
Good point. Hope you think about THAT on your birthday. ‘Happy Thinking About The Day Your Parents Had Passionate Sex Conceiving You Day’.
Click to expand...
On your parents' birthdays you get to think about your grandparents having wild passionate sex.
 
#35,080
#35,080
LaagerVol said:
Recovery Soldiers Ministry. Christ based drug/alcohol recovery center. It’s a 12 month program and they have, through JESUS, restored so many lives and families.
Click to expand...

I have a good friend who works with a recovery ministry not sure the name I will have to check that out. Chris McDaniel is his name. Played in the band Confederate Railroad before his conversion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brillovol, Paper_Towel, Vol464 and 5 others
#35,086
#35,086
mr.checkerboards said:
Yeah, im just still mad about all the zone vs Florida
Click to expand...

Part of me agrees but I also think we would have gotten torched on the ground if we were as aggressive on D against UF like were were against Pitt. We played the odds based on Richardson not having shown the ability to beat you in the passing game. Unfortunately our DBs were pretty awful and UF torched them but, other than some horrible tackling in the first half, most of the damage UF did was very late in the game when they were down by 3 scores.

We had strategic moments of bringing pressure that worked....late INT being a great example. It was frustrating at times but it was a winning strategy and we absolutely shut down their run game which was the strength of their offense. Putting DBs on islands while blitzing Richardson and giving him an opportunity to make plays with his legs would have been a losing strategy, IMO. He would have gotten past the second level and shredded our slow, poor tackling secondar....especially the safeties. We will be able to play aggressive more consistently when we have more talent, especially at DB and LB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paper_Towel, hooter vol, Volnut and 2 others
#35,088
#35,088
gainesvol82 said:
Part of me agrees but I also think we would have gotten torched on the ground if we were as aggressive on D against UF like were were against Pitt. We played the odds based on Richardson not having shown the ability to beat you in the passing game. Unfortunately our DBs were pretty awful and UF torched them but, other than some horrible tackling in the first half, most of the damage UF did was very late in the game when they were down by 3 scores.

We had strategic moments of bringing pressure that worked....late INT being a great example. It was frustrating at times but it was a winning strategy and we absolutely shut down their run game which was the strength of their offense. Putting DBs on islands while blitzing Richardson and giving him an opportunity to make plays with his legs would have been a losing strategy, IMO. He would have gotten past the second level and shredded our slow, poor tackling secondar....especially the safeties. We will be able to play aggressive more consistently when we have more talent, especially at DB and LB.
Click to expand...
You cant tell me, Mizzou has more talent on the backend then us, and look at how aggressive they are tonight. Dont coach scared
 
#35,095
#35,095
What a day of football fellas. Love watching the TAMU collapse. They are stuck with Jimbo, too. Also love seeing OU get blasted with all of our transfers

LSU going to be a tough game next week. Daniels can run, their defense is fast, and Kelly is a good coach. Still think we can beat them, but we'll have to play better defensively for that to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volpac Sackyou, InVOLuntary and orangejuice
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top