Vol464
New location
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2012
- Messages
- 6,167
- Likes
- 7,976
Well, if our DBs are being taught to look for the ball, they're obviously failing a lot. You can watch our games and see they don't look back for the ball. It factors into some of our PI calls this year. It's a basic skill of the position. Yet we fail to do it quite often. Is it talent? Is it coaching? Who the hell really knows? But if we continue to do it season after season, that leans toward coaching, So we'll see if that gets fixed this year.I doubt that…. Some people already have their minds made up…. I felt the same way about Willie when he was here before… I looked up the stats and realized he wasn’t that bad… I brought that up and credit was given to Derek Barnett….We are too emotionally tied to our team and a lot of times…. Our perceptions don’t match reality… it’s why feel all of our DBs suck and every other teams DBs are the next big thing. Having a DC whose specialty is DBs makes me feel confident that he would change something if he didn’t like the way it was being taught.
Devil's Advocate: if our defense's goal is to bend but dont break, and never allow anything over the top, then between the 20s we're going to see 10yd cushions. Our defense is great in the red zone. But if we play tight in the open field we risk giving up more big plays and long touchdowns.No fanbase is ever completely satisfied. There will always be rowdies. But DBs not giving 10yd cushions and actually playing the ball will satisfy most of the VN outrage. Not all, but most.
No fanbase is ever completely satisfied. There will always be rowdies. But DBs not giving 10yd cushions and actually playing the ball will satisfy most of the VN outrage. Not all, but most.
Always your default solution. How about troll less intentionally? If we go another season with no progress in production, there will be more subscribing to your vendetta…promise. I don’t have a “problem” with opinions. Just incessant beating others on the head with it.
How good is Davison? Our secondary will never satisfy the fanbase…. We play too fast and score too much for our secondary to look good enough to appease our fanbase… we just need them to be competitive in every game.
You called us 3rd and Chavis…. Do you realize that we were 29th in the entire country in 3rd down defense and 4th in the SEC? We were also the only team in the SEC to play the top 3 teams in the SEC(besides us)….LSU, Georgia, and AlabamaWell, if our DBs are being taught to look for the ball, they're obviously failing a lot. You can watch our games and see they don't look back for the ball. It factors into some of our PI calls this year. It's a basic skill of the position. Yet we fail to do it quite often. Is it talent? Is it coaching? Who the hell really knows? But if we continue to do it season after season, that leans toward coaching, So we'll see if that gets fixed this year.
As far as the 10 yd cushions, maybe it's a limited scheme based on the players we have? Again, I don't know, but you can't leave those huge cushions. It's 3rd and Chavis all over again. Scheme has to get better. Even in zone, you can't play with such huge cushions on the WRs.
I can't speak for everyone else but fix those two things specifically and I'll stop bitching about our secondary.
Devil's Advocate: if our defense's goal is to bend but dont break, and never allow anything over the top, then between the 20s we're going to see 10yd cushions. Our defense is great in the red zone. But if we play tight in the open field we risk giving up more big plays and long touchdowns.
What metric are you using to rank them? If it’s yardage then who gives a sh$t? I do think they need to improve… they weren’t as bad as what we make them out to be though…. The SC game was sh&t though.False. It’s one thing for a secondary to not play well once in awhile. But to get consistently get torched? Yeah no thanks. You mean to tell me we can’t get a secondary ranked in say the 50-60th range instead of 100? I don’t buy it.
Yep…. They did really good especially with all the challenges…. Can’t have games like SC though.On 52 redzone trips our defense gave up only 39 scores (27 TDs). That's a 75% scoring rate, 52% TD rate. Only allowed 10 TDs outside of the redzone.
We allowed 3rd down conversions at a 34% rate. 4th down at 42%. Those are not bad numbers.
Opponent QBs completed 62.5% of their passes for an average of 289yds per game.
Defense forced 11INTs, 18 fumbles (recovered 11), 27 sacks.
Edit to add: Our defense does it's job. We aren't designed to have a Bama/Georgia lockdown defense. We are designed to force offenses to sustain long drives without turning it over, sputtering, or making their own mistake. Then we turn up the heat in the second half to force more mistakes and exploit weaknesses that pop up during the course of the game.
What metric are you using to rank them? If it’s yardage then who gives a sh$t? I do think they need to improve… they weren’t as bad as what we make them out to be though…. The SC game was sh&t though.
Play with good fundamentals. Look for the ball. Break on the ball. Good form tackling. I get that some posters on here hate to read any criticism of our team, but in a lot of games our secondary played with poor fundamentals. They didn't turn their heads to find the ball. They broke late on the ball. And they focused more on trying to strip the ball than making the tackle, often giving the receiver extra yardage.Devil's Advocate: if our defense's goal is to bend but dont break, and never allow anything over the top, then between the 20s we're going to see 10yd cushions. Our defense is great in the red zone. But if we play tight in the open field we risk giving up more big plays and long touchdowns.