cd12
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
- Messages
- 15,825
- Likes
- 612
he was byu's only offensive option. hard to expect him to be an elite defender. the jury is still out on his defensive ability.
Nobody plays D, because everybody plays D. It's a paradox.
BYU's Jimmer Fredette - ESPN
I usually respect Reilly, but I think this kind of makes him look like an idiot. He hammers Jimmer for not being spectacular in the one game he watched Fredette. Fredette played his heart out and had nothing left in the tank for OT. In regulation he scored 32 at 42% (and was never open) with 4 TO's. The Jimmerettes scored 36 at 34% (and were frequently open).
He thinks he can't be a good pro because of his D?
(1) nobody plays D in the NBA
(2) defense can be taught
(3) Jimmer couldn't afford too much defensive effort, because BYU needs him 40 minutes every night on the offensive end
One on one nobody in the NBA can defend anybody really. It's not a paradox. You need help defense to stop even an average scorer at times. The majority of blocks come from help defense and maybe most of steals, too. The trick to on the ball D is slow your guy down enough so that your center has time to try to alter his shot, cause you aren't stopping anybody consistently on your own.
And btw, they said the same stuff about Redick's D in college, but he's a respectable NBA defender now. I've seen him do a great job defending guys like Ray Allen, even.
If you are saying at that level great offense beats defense, one-on-one I agree but it's because guys are better at making contested shots, where as at lower levels many guys struggle with that.
Guys play great D on Kobe but he still busts a jumper even with a hand in his face.