Remember the Loyola game in 2018

#28
#28
If the refs had been honest, the one ref should have said, hey I don't know I got knocked into the 2 row of the stands. The other 2 should have said, I wasn't in position to see. Then, at that point couldn't they have gone to the monitor to review, given that they all 3 had a legit reason to not know. Or would it have gone to the possession arrow?
At that point they would just call a jump ball and award the team with the possession arrow the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knoxvol52
#29
#29
Can’t review possession unless it’s under 2 minutes to go. Thats why it was not reviewed last night.
It’s the most BS **** in CBB. “It’s only important to get it right if it’s in the last 2 minutes” is what they’re telling us by having this rule. Never understood this. We could have people in a studio review every questionable play in 10 seconds or less. Stupid people like to say that the humanity of refs is part of the game. My question, if it doesn’t have to be, then why? There’s nothing good about a bad call ever. It doesn’t make the game more entertaining, more fun, or more fair. It just causes the wrong team to lose at times.
 
#32
#32
Loyola has the ball, behind by 1 on their last possession. Ball goes out of bound and official signals Vols ball. However a REVIEW shows, correctly unfortunately , that it was off one of our players. Seconds later Loyola hits the winning shot that bounced on the rim 3 times before going in and win the game.

So why was that reviewable and the out of bounds last night that replays clearly showed was off Auburn was not?

1. Have they changed the rule from 6 years ago?

2. Different rules for the tourney?

3. Reviewable only if you have a 110 year old nun on your bench?(just kidding)

Thx

Speaking of which……

 
  • Like
Reactions: knoxvol52

VN Store



Back
Top