I'm aware I misspelled a word but didn't feel it was worth the time or energy to correct it as it was pretty obvious what the point was.
The spelling police usually come out when they have nothing of substance to say.
There's no reason to give a substantive reply to nonsense posts from people who have been here 10 minutes and profess to have such a great idea of how things work here. When you finally post something worthy of debate, which will be an upset on par with Chaminade over Virginia, you'll get something other than ridicule in response.I'm aware I misspelled a word but didn't feel it was worth the time or energy to correct it as it was pretty obvious what the point was.
The spelling police usually come out when they have nothing of substance to say.
There's no reason to give a substantive reply to nonsense posts from people who have been here 10 minutes and profess to have such a great idea of how things work here. When you finally post something worthy of debate, which will be an upset on par with Chaminade over Virginia, you'll get something other than ridicule in response.
There's no reason to give a substantive reply to nonsense posts from people who have been here 10 minutes and profess to have such a great idea of how things work here. When you finally post something worthy of debate, which will be an upset on par with Chaminade over Virginia, you'll get something other than ridicule in response.
It has nothing to do with post count. You've been here about a week, yet you mention what you have and haven't seen people post around here. You've made your position clear. You're a Pearl honk who has nothing to add that the rest of The Pearlite Choir hasn't already said a million times. That makes it easier for me to simply lump you in with the Refugees From Hoopsville and the rest of the Tanning Bed Worship Society. If you ever come up with something that isn't in the "He's Not Wade Houston/We Were #1 For 8 Minutes/I Love That He Signs Autographs For The Snot Nosed Kids and Diaper Wearing Geriatrics" Prayer Book, let me know.Ahhh, so there it is. The post count comeback. Long lost cousin to the spelling police reply. I was wondering if you had it in you to pull this one out of your bag of tricks. Truly disappointing effort. :bad:
It has nothing to do with post count. You've been here about a week, yet you mention what you have and haven't seen people post around here. You've made your position clear. You're a Pearl honk who has nothing to add that the rest of The Pearlite Choir hasn't already said a million times. That makes it easier for me to simply lump you in with the Refugees From Hoopsville and the rest of the Tanning Bed Worship Society. If you ever come up with something that isn't in the "He's Not Wade Houston/We Were #1 For 8 Minutes/I Love That He Signs Autographs For The Snot Nosed Kids and Diaper Wearing Geriatrics" Prayer Book, let me know.
Why would I waste my time? You're nothing more than just another in the long line of Pearlophiles who puke forth the same inane defenses. Of course, his performance isn't giving you guys anything new to work with. Until Bronzer actually accomplishes something that remotely validates the slobbering adoration he gets from the Refugees and the rest of their ilk, the debate is stale.If you ever want to drop your junior high name calling act I'd be glad to talk basketball in a civilized manner.
Show me where I've leveled unwarranted criticism at a player, then I might grant you have a point.I haven't been on VN long but I'm beginning to see a pattern. Some are claiming that they are just "not drinking the kool-aid", " taking off the glasses", or "keeping it real". But, calling someone "worthless", "a waste of a scholarship", or condemning them for pursuing something other than basketball while in school is wrong and really not your place. I think that level of rancor and negativity has become the norm on this board and has emboldened some to the elevated level or criticism that is now rampant here. It surely is not objective, as some have implied. It is purely speculative, unqualified, and seems to be directed mostly at the coach and it turn, filters down to select players.
I guess a better way to put that would be; if Pearl wasn't the coach, some of the posters wouldn't be so hard on the players. You want him gone so badly, that it colors your judgement of the team; the worse they perform, the more likely Pearl will be gone, and you can get a "better" coach. That is the definition of prejudicial. You harbor a bias against Pearl (not for race, religion, etc.... mind you) but for his perceived inabilities. That bias opens the rest of the team up to a greater level of scrutiny based upon the feelings you have for him....
Show me where I've leveled unwarranted criticism at a player, then I might grant you have a point.
Why would I waste my time? You're nothing more than just another in the long line of Pearlophiles who puke forth the same inane defenses. Of course, his performance isn't giving you guys anything new to work with. Until Bronzer actually accomplishes something that remotely validates the slobbering adoration he gets from the Refugees and the rest of their ilk, the debate is stale.
I'm not sure I'm getting your point. The guy making the money should certainly get the majority of the heat. However, I see someone saying Woolridge is a "waste of a scholarship" differently than you do. Is it a harsh way to say Tennessee needs to recruit guys better than him? Yes, but I don't take that to mean anyone wants him drawn and quartered. Any player, especially the son of a former NBA player, knows his performance is going to be under a micriscope at a big time program. If a guy doesn't want that pressure, they can always go play at Pepperdine.Don't get me wrong, I know you dislike Pearl, hatvol, but that goes with the territory when you're making a cool $2 million a year. It's like Ok St coach Mike Gundy shouldering the blame a couple of years ago. Pearl's a "grown man". He's the one that does warrant the majority of the criticism for perceived under-performance.
These guys playing basketball are getting room and board and an education, but they are bringing in plenty of revenue. If TBA has 17-20,000 people every game and the SEC has a huge TV contract that pays UT, then the players are more than paying for their scholarships. Other students in Tennessee get the HOPE scholarship for being decent students and, I guess, just being a TN resident.
I'm not sure I'm getting your point. The guy making the money should certainly get the majority of the heat. However, I see someone saying Woolridge is a "waste of a scholarship" differently than you do. Is it a harsh way to say Tennessee needs to recruit guys better than him? Yes, but I don't take that to mean anyone wants him drawn and quartered. Any player, especially the son of a former NBA player, knows his performance is going to be under a micriscope at a big time program. If a guy doesn't want that pressure, they can always go play at Pepperdine.
I don't see anything wrong with taking that position.