Riley Ferguson

#51
#51
Questioning this decision would get you skinned alive two years ago. History was literally rewritten on Volnation to explain why Dobbs was the #3 QB behind Peterman. Dobbs was demoted to #3 and Peterman promoted to #2 due to Peterman's strong passing accuracy and Dobbs erratic passing. Peterman was NOT #2 because Dobbs was earmarked for red-shirt. That's a fiction. Dobbs was earmarked for RS because he was #3 behind Peterman, thus RS was a convenience.

The fact is that Peterman was a far far superior passing QB whose skills in QB camp were far far ahead of Dobbs and clearly the better than Worley. Frankly, Peterman was stunningly accurate in practice drills with darn near perfect ball placement. Peterman fractured a finger against Florida in his first start, but continued to play, resulting in the wild passes and fumbles everyone remembers.

The fact is, Dobbs has been highly erratic and inaccurate since the beginning. Nothing changed.
Due to a horrendously ineffective offensive line in 2014, it became apparent that we needed a QB who could run for his life against Alabama. Dobbs was inserted, did well, and the fans bought in to the hype and the rest is history.

Dobbs truly did give us a chance to compete with his legs. We traded a QB for a third running back. Now, we are living with that hangover. Only now are people coming to terms with the reality that we have no QB behind center. Peterman and Ferguson moved on. So did PW. Dobbs was never a QB, but a gimmick runner who kept things interesting - at the cost of a passing attack.

Really? Why have you kept this to yourself for so long? :huh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#55
#55
I like the fact that both Peterman and Ferguson have performed very well at Pittsburg and at Memphis. It adds flavor to the difficult decision that the coaches were having when these two were competing with Josh Dobbs for the starting qb job. It also shows that there was a reason that Dobbs was running behind the other two for a period of time.

Currently Dobbs vs Ferguson

efficiency rating - comp % - TD's - yards passing
Dobbs 138 59% 18 1869
Ferguson 151.89 63.5% 21 2565

These are different qbs in different systems, with different receivers and playing against different defenses. Having said that -- it is great to see that there is more to Mr. Ferguson than trick throws on You Tube. I wish all three of these guys continued success.

Don't talk to me about stats of two players that have to face off against completely different levels of competition. All you've got with this is a big what if argument which means squat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#59
#59
There is absolutely no way to know how Ferguson or Peterman or anyone else would be doing if they were QBing for the Vols today
 
#60
#60
I like the fact that both Peterman and Ferguson have performed very well at Pittsburg and at Memphis. It adds flavor to the difficult decision that the coaches were having when these two were competing with Josh Dobbs for the starting qb job. It also shows that there was a reason that Dobbs was running behind the other two for a period of time.

Currently Dobbs vs Ferguson

efficiency rating - comp % - TD's - yards passing
Dobbs 138 59% 18 1869
Ferguson 151.89 63.5% 21 2565

These are different qbs in different systems, with different receivers and playing against different defenses. Having said that -- it is great to see that there is more to Mr. Ferguson than trick throws on You Tube. I wish all three of these guys continued success.

Yep, the SEC isn't for everyone...
 
#61
#61
Don't talk to me about stats of two players that have to face off against completely different levels of competition. All you've got with this is a big what if argument which means squat.


Dobbs QB play = Squat!
 

VN Store



Back
Top