Orangeburst
Attention all Planets of the Solar Federation
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 48,169
- Likes
- 110,508
I don't think it's an excuse. Data is a moneymaker and if a large portion are ghost accounts, that's a huge devaluation once the sale hits.It's not the bots, it's buyer's remorse. He waived due diligence and while reviewing the books, tech valuations crashed. The bots are just an excuse. If the tech valuations went up by 40% during the time to close the deal, you wouldn't hear about the bots...
Back in 2015-2016 there were people that did some reviews behind the scenes of places like Reddit, as well. They found absolutely shocking misrepresentations of activity, both suppression of certain subreddits and inflation of others.I don't think it's an excuse. Data is a moneymaker and if a large portion are ghost accounts, that's a huge devaluation once the sale hits.
Tech valuations crashed by 25-40%.I don't think it's an excuse. Data is a moneymaker and if a large portion are ghost accounts, that's a huge devaluation once the sale hits.
Back in 2015-2016 there were people that did some reviews behind the scenes of places like Reddit, as well. They found absolutely shocking misrepresentations of activity, both suppression of certain subreddits and inflation of others.
Lying like this is tech standard.
Back in 2015-2016 there were people that did some reviews behind the scenes of places like Reddit, as well. They found absolutely shocking misrepresentations of activity, both suppression of certain subreddits and inflation of others.
Lying like this is tech standard.
Tech valuations crashed by 25-40%.
There would have to be 40% fake accounts to equate to the tech valuation reduction.
I'm not saying Twitter isn't crap or that they might have understated the fakes but this is buyer's remorse wrapped up in a straw man argument.
Maybe I am confused..but since we dont know the overvaluation of Twitter accounts YET...what does a general tech crash have to do with this?
Look at your 401k. The value of tech companies crashed big time in the 2nd quarter. He essentially said he'd prepay for a steak at $30 and now the steak is worth $15 and he wants to send it back to the kitchen before he sees it because it might have too much fat on it...
You have ceased with the “thanks Joe” for a little while now. Was that on purpose ?Remember when all the leg-humpers on here were celebrating Musk's takeover of Twitter and I said it would all end in tears for him and got mocked for saying that. Tell you guys, always bet on evil. I ain't wrong very often.
This is the type of stuff we've been saying the whole time @evillawyerNo it's not. It's a part of any acquisition. Reviewing the books and product to make sure there isn't anything nefarious. If he pulls out because fake accounts have a high share in the total product, Twitter tanks and suffers a harsh black mark and potential suits.
Remember when all the leg-humpers on here were celebrating Musk's takeover of Twitter and I said it would all end in tears for him and got mocked for saying that. Tell you guys, always bet on evil. I ain't wrong very often.
Discovery is going to be interesting. I'd imagine an SEC investigation may occur along sideYou're yet to be right on anything. Refresh your contract law (counselor?). How is this going to be reconciled. He did his due diligence as much as possible. What next? Cards on the table is the only way out. They will have to show through 3rd party audit.