Roe vs Wade Overturned

The only ones being violent I've seen are the anarchists and instigators. I have heard that they narrowed thier protests down to cancelling the Fourth of July and wearing all black instead because, "freedom is dead." Y'all are going to sweat like hotdogs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
The only ones being violent I've seen are the anarchists and instigators. I have heard that they narrowed thier protests down to cancelling the Fourth of July and wearing all black instead because, "freedom is dead." Y'all are going to sweat like hotdogs.
So some of your peeps are gonna dress in all black and take a knee or cry or otherwise protest the evil US of A on her birthday?

I can live with that.

😂🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bassmaster_Vol
I told my wife I would put on a pussy hat and walk around for a while if she wanted me to. She just threw back about a third a bottle instead last night. We both know there is only one way out of this and that's to vote you into dust. We do our part every election. We need others to do the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRUEFANVol
Yes. This is what the article I posted a couple of pages back alluded to.
I understand not agreeing with the ruling. I understand ascribing judicial activism to the ruling when rulings go against personal beliefs.

I don't understand the concept that once a ruling is made the court's decision is infallible. I also don't understand the concept that the overturned ruling decision is infallible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRUEFANVol
The only ones being violent I've seen are the anarchists and instigators. I have heard that they narrowed thier protests down to cancelling the Fourth of July and wearing all black instead because, "freedom is dead." Y'all are going to sweat like hotdogs.

There will be more and bigger celebrations on the 4th this year than last or the year before . Capitalism and the constitution lives to fight another year . 🙌
 
The only ones being violent I've seen are the anarchists and instigators. I have heard that they narrowed thier protests down to cancelling the Fourth of July and wearing all black instead because, "freedom is dead." Y'all are going to sweat like hotdogs.
Wearing black on the 4th isn't smart for a lot of the country.
 
I told my wife I would put on a pussy hat and walk around for a while if she wanted me to. She just threw back about a third a bottle instead last night. We both know there is only one way out of this and that's to vote you into dust. We do our part every election. We need others to do the same.
That's funny.
 
I told my wife I would put on a pussy hat and walk around for a while if she wanted me to. She just threw back about a third a bottle instead last night. We both know there is only one way out of this and that's to vote you into dust. We do our part every election. We need others to do the same.

The fact that you would be to willing to admit this and put on a Pussy hat for any reason is very telling . Did your wife eventually give you your balls back when she sobered up or nah ?
 
I told my wife I would put on a pussy hat and walk around for a while if she wanted me to. She just threw back about a third a bottle instead last night. We both know there is only one way out of this and that's to vote you into dust. We do our part every election. We need others to do the same.
Took 50 years to get it reversed. I wish you good health for the next 50+ to see it through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caculator
I told my wife I would put on a pussy hat and walk around for a while if she wanted me to. She just threw back about a third a bottle instead last night. We both know there is only one way out of this and that's to vote you into dust. We do our part every election. We need others to do the same.


The more things change the more they stay the same
 
You're more naïve than I thought if you don't believe that these justices didn't know what they were doing and the ramifications of taking up and overturning established law. You're being disingenuous in the conversation if you don't think the fight for SC Justices by Presidents and the Senate confirmers isn't anything but a path to legislative change.

Gloat over R v W, to the winner go the spoils - but don't embarrass yourself by acting like this isn't judicial activism.
Why hasn't the left ever codified Roe v. Wade? They've controlled Congress and the WH going on two years. The decision to overturn was leaked a few months back. Why haven't the Democrats taken action? They're so outraged that they've sat on their asses and done nothing.
 
I told my wife I would put on a pussy hat and walk around for a while if she wanted me to. She just threw back about a third a bottle instead last night. We both know there is only one way out of this and that's to vote you into dust. We do our part every election. We need others to do the same.
If by 'you' you mean the USA, the congratulations: mission accomplished.
 
I understand not agreeing with the ruling. I understand ascribing judicial activism to the ruling when rulings go against personal beliefs.

I don't understand the concept that once a ruling is made the court's decision is infallible. I also don't understand the concept that the overturned ruling decision is infallible.
I think what this case exemplifies is that the only perpetual machine known to man is activism in legislation and judiciary rulings and it’s highly under damped. Even Justice Ginsburg felt RvW went too far. I am not speaking pro or anti abortion in this ruling. This is a Constitutional matter where SCOTUS judges wrote legislation from the bench that was foolishly put forth as settled law and has now been vacated. I do not believe there is any manner you can infer in the Constitution that the Feds have to power to legislate reproductive rights. And if any federal legislation is put forth going forward to restrict those rights to either extreme should be struck down.

After 50 years I think SCOTUS actually got it right. However for 50 years a large number of people have been flaunting a right that did not exist at the federal level. Going forth they will be limited by how their peers vote in their states legislation. As it should be. However sadly many states have already set legislation in place to automatically over correct if what just happened ever occurred. And my own state’s tattle tale law is just plain stupid.
 
Last edited:
Why hasn't the left ever codified Roe v. Wade? They've controlled Congress and the WH going on two years. The decision to overturn was leaked a few months back. Why haven't the Democrats taken action? They're so outraged that they've sat on their asses and done nothing.

Never let a crisis go to waste. Same reason Biden was in support of the Hyde Amendment for decades but had to switch to get elected.
 
I think what this case exemplifies is that the only perpetual machine known to man is activism in legislation and judiciary rulings and it’s highly under damped. Even Justice Ginsburg felt RvW went too far. I am not speaking pro or anti abortion in this ruling. This is a Constitutional matter where SCOTUS judges wrote legislation from the bench that was foolishly put forth as settled law and has now been vacated. I do not believe there is any manner you can infer in the Constitution that the Feds have to power to legislate reproductive rights. And if any federal legislation is put forth going forward to restrict those rights to either extreme should be struck down.

After 50 years I think SCOTUS actually got it right. However for 50 years a large number of people have been flaunting a right that did not exist at the federal level. Going forth they will be limited by how their peers vote in their states legislation. As it should be. However sadly many states have already set legislation in place to automatically over correct if what just happened ever occurred. And my own state’s tattle tale law is just plain stupid.
Great post. Insightful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
I told my wife I would put on a pussy hat and walk around for a while if she wanted me to. She just threw back about a third a bottle instead last night. We both know there is only one way out of this and that's to vote you into dust. We do our part every election. We need others to do the same.

Is this a parity account? If so, you’re a genius
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
No, school shooting occurrences.

Hysteria and/or dishonesty destroys conversation. There are not hundreds of school shootings annually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1846458

Guns, School Shooters, and School Safety: What We Know and Directions for Change

PREVALENCE OF SCHOOL SHOOTINGS
Shortly after the December 2012 Sandy Hook massacre in Connecticut, Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety (www.everytown.org) began tracking incidents of gunfire on school property, providing a data resource that has garnered wide-ranging attention. Everytown included in their case listing a total of 361 shootings at schools and colleges from 2013 to 2018, averaging about one per week based on a full calendar year. However, a breakdown of the Everytown cases displayed in Table 1 reveals that only 105 of the 361 incidents resulted in any injury, and 25 in any deaths, to students or adults confronted by an armed assailant in an elementary or secondary school. The remaining incidents, although not unimportant, include shootings at college campuses or such occurrences as suicide attempts, evening altercations on school grounds between adults with no connection to the school, and accidental or intentional gunfire that struck no one. In terms of fatalities, as shown in Table 2, over the 6 years from 2013 to 2018 a total of 40 students in grades K–12 were killed by an assailant’s bullet including the 22 who were slain in the 2018 mass shootings in Parkland, Florida, and Santa Fe, Texas. That total is out of the 55 million children enrolled in our nation’s primary and secondary schools, less than a one-in-a-million risk for any particular student over that time frame.

The location of school shootings also has implications for security planning. School grounds, buses, bus stops, and parking lots where students linger in the after-school hours can be vulnerable locations. However, half of the gunshot victims in the Everytown data were targeted outside the school building where measures such as metal detectors, armed guards, and even preparedness drills provide little help (Fox & Fridel, 2019). Many of these violent altercations occurred during school-sponsored athletic contests, especially those involving arch rivals.

Much of the fear and policy debate related to school shootings centers not so much on single homicides that often involve a specifically targeted victim, but on the most dreadful and high-profile incidents—such as Sandy Hook, Parkland, and Santa Fe—in which large numbers of students and faculty are killed in an indiscriminate fashion. These too are the episodes that dominate the fatality statistics. However, our collective memories are limited, as many Americans believe this to be a new phenomenon impacting our nation’s schools. As shown in Table 3, the late 1990s witnessed more multiple-victim shootings, including four in one school year, than we have seen in recent years.

Table 3. Multiple-Victim School Shootings 1996–2018
Multiple-victim shootings dominate media headlines and drive the debate about school security (Berkowitz et al., 2018). Yet, to a parent, it matters not whether a child is killed during a large-scale massacre or an isolated incident. Figure 1 displays the long-term trend in fatal school gun assaults both in terms of the number of incidents and the aggregate number killed each year. Other than the spikes in deaths associated with Columbine (1998–1999), Sandy Hook (2012–2013), and both Marjory Stoneman Douglas and Santa Fe (2017–2018), the numbers trend downward. If anything, schools are safer than they have been for decades (Modzeleski et al., 2015). According the U.S. Departments of Education and Justice indicators report, schools have reported significant declines in serious violent crime at least over the past 15 years (Musu et al., 2019). In fact, for some children, school is their safest place, offering structure and supervision that they may not enjoy elsewhere (Fox & Burstein, 2010).

Figure 1. Fatal Shootings in Primary and Secondary Schools

Sources: National School Safety Center and Centers for Disease Control.

uspr_a_1846458_f0001_b.jpg
 

VN Store



Back
Top