What the hell just happened in this thread?
If I read it correctly, the OP just stated the following:
Romney attacked the stance the White House took, saying that free speech ought never to be besmirched; the backdrop being an anti-Islam film.
Then, the OP went on to state that Romney, although he has yet to make such statements on record, would condemn free speech if an anti-Mormon movie was made.
Is this correct?
What kind of ****ed up bizarro world do you live in, Vol Main? You are taking shots at a guy due to your own projection of how he would react in a certain situation. Moreover, has Romney made any statements with regard to the critically-acclaimed Broadway play, "The Book of Mormon"? Oh, in fact, Romney has made the following statement:
So, basically, you are dead wrong, Vol Main.
The official statement from the embassy website:
"The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others."
Mitt Romney attacked this statement and defended the right of free speech for Americans to make hateful films about religion. Does he then support free speech to make a hateful film about Morons?
Point is that he will turn around and say the exact opposite, if he hasn't already...all the while maintaining that his original statement is valid as he is contradicting it.
Romney's reaction to a movie that negatively portrays Mormonism. He's already reacted, and not in the way you said he would.
If you're going to stir the pot for the hell of it, at least have a good memory.Thanks for telling me that. I don't remember saying how he would react. Oh wait, I don't remember saying how he would react...because...I didn't say how he would react! Wow, I'm glad we got that worked out.
Point is that he will turn around and say the exact opposite, if he hasn't already...all the while maintaining that his original statement is valid as he is contradicting it.
Romney's reaction to a movie that negatively portrays Mormonism. He's already reacted, and not in the way you said he would.
Here's the deal. Romney will do exactly what I said he will do. I'll post a link for you to read, but you won't get it. I mean you will read it in black and white, but you won't know what it means. I got five bucks saying he'll do that and you'll do that. Trouble is, you'll act too stupid to know he did that and you did that, and stiff me on the wager like a no class bum. And then you'll insult me in the bargain. That's low down act, MG.
Here's the deal. Romney will do exactly what I said he will do. I'll post a link for you to read, but you won't get it. I mean you will read it in black and white, but you won't know what it means. I got five bucks saying he'll do that and you'll do that. Trouble is, you'll act too stupid to know he did that and you did that, and stiff me on the wager like a no class bum. And then you'll insult me in the bargain. That's low down act, MG.