chuckiepoo
Aiken born; Knoxpatch six months later
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
- Messages
- 27,809
- Likes
- 68,894
Tubby and Cal have practically the same winning percentage in the tourney:They would be lottery picks without Cal. If he had the ability to develop a player, his lottery pick talent would produce when called upon. He is an “average at best” X and O coach and his game planning is even worse. Tubby Smith has a better record in the NCAA tournament than Cal, during his time at Kentucky.
I think the 5 star kids go play for him because they know they will start, be treated like Kings in that state and hear no qualms about leaving after one year. Because most of them do leave after 1 year.He develops talent well enough that they are lottery picks and many have very successful pro careers. Whether or not it's his work is open to debate, but those results have a lot to do with 5-star kids wanting to play for him.
That is exactly the vision the vision he sells. Not about winning a conference title or an NCAA championship. It’s about getting paid, baby. Most of them are willing to stick it out a full year for the causeI think the 5 star kids go play for him because they know they will start, be treated like Kings in that state and hear no qualms about leaving after one year. Because most of them do leave after 1 year.
Cal’s biggest problem is that he isn’t that great of a coach. Kentucky had 3-4 days to prepare for Oakland’s matchup zone, yet looked completely lost and unprepared for it. Same thing happened in the loss against St. Peter’s two years ago. KY was in complete control of the game, then Shaheen Holloway went zone in the last 6-7 minutes. Kentucky had no clue how to handle it offensively. Zero adjustments were made by Cal. KY hasn’t been the same since Cal and John Robic had their falling out. Robic had been Cal’s right hand man since his days at UMASS and was considered a great X’s and O’s guy.Calipari's biggest problem is that he hasn't figured out how to blend the top young talent he brings in every
year with more experienced players who might be a shade less talented than his annual group of 5 stars but
offers the cohesion, leadership, and role play that one needs, usually, to have an outstanding team. His
team, almost every year, is very talented and very young--and it's hard to win in the NCAA with a bunch of
freshman/sophs. That's a fact.
Kentucky was also a victim yesterday of a kid who shot out of his mind--made 10 of 20 Trey attempts. He's normally a 38 percent three-point shooter. There's always the risk of running into a team that has a very good day shooting threes.
That is exactly the vision the vision he sells. Not about winning a conference title or an NCAA championship. It’s about getting paid, baby. Most of them are willing to stick it out a full year for the cause
No debate for me. Most of those kids would be lottery picks if they played at Slippery Rock. The NBA already knows plenty about them before they ever get to KY. If he “developed” talent better, he’d have more than one NCAA title.
They would be lottery picks without Cal. If he had the ability to develop a player, his lottery pick talent would produce when called upon. He is an “average at best” X and O coach and his game planning is even worse. Tubby Smith has a better record in the NCAA tournament than Cal, during his time at Kentucky.
Calipari's biggest problem is that he hasn't figured out how to blend the top young talent he brings in every
year with more experienced players who might be a shade less talented than his annual group of 5 stars but
offers the cohesion, leadership, and role play that one needs, usually, to have an outstanding team. His
team, almost every year, is very talented and very young--and it's hard to win in the NCAA with a bunch of
freshman/sophs. That's a fact.
Kentucky was also a victim yesterday of a kid who shot out of his mind--made 10 of 20 Trey attempts. He's normally a 38 percent three-point shooter. There's always the risk of running into a team that has a very good day shooting threes.
It’s an exaggeration about Slippery Rock. There is something to be said about better competition in D1 ball. But they can get that under better coaches than Calipari. He is a good salesman though and nobody can deny that one. Most used car salesmen are too. He sells them on the idea that he can get them to the league when most of them are going to get there anyway. Whatever he’s doing for them, it ain’t translating to success in the NCAA Tournament.You guys might very well be right, as I said it's open to debate. However, those kids and their parents consistently choose to go to KY and not Slippery Rock, so there's something to be said for that.
The fact that he's made no bones about the fact that preparing kids for NBA careers is his #1 priority leads me to believe that he's doing something right in getting these kids ready for the next level, be it helping them refine their games or just with being able to handle the rigors and life of an NBA player.
Yeah,I've that about him myself. He sounds like he wants to be a counselor(which there's nothing wrong with),but he's coaching at an Elite basketball school. If he wants to do something like that, maybe get a job in the NBA that helps develop young talent and teach them about the rigors of the game.You guys might very well be right, as I said it's open to debate. However, those kids and their parents consistently choose to go to KY and not Slippery Rock, so there's something to be said for that.
The fact that he's made no bones about the fact that preparing kids for NBA careers is his #1 priority leads me to believe that he's doing something right in getting these kids ready for the next level, be it helping them refine their games or just with being able to handle the rigors and life of an NBA player.
Yeah,I've that about him myself. He sounds like he wants to be a counselor(which there's nothing wrong with),but he's coaching at an Elite basketball school. If he wants to do something like that, maybe get a job in the NBA that helps develop young talent and teach them about the rigors of the game.
Of course there's 33 million reasons that it likely won't happen. I wouldn't be content if I was a Kentucky fan dealing with lack of tournament success year in and year out, that's for sure.
His ego is his problem.Cal’s biggest problem is that he isn’t that great of a coach. Kentucky had 3-4 days to prepare for Oakland’s matchup zone, yet looked completely lost and unprepared for it. Same thing happened in the loss against St. Peter’s two years ago. KY was in complete control of the game, then Shaheen Holloway went zone in the last 6-7 minutes. Kentucky had no clue how to handle it offensively. Zero adjustments were made by Cal. KY hasn’t been the same since Cal and John Robic had their falling out. Robic had been Cal’s right hand man since his days at UMASS and was considered a great X’s and O’s guy.
That is the problem you have when you have no Mashack to put on him.Calipari's biggest problem is that he hasn't figured out how to blend the top young talent he brings in every
year with more experienced players who might be a shade less talented than his annual group of 5 stars but
offers the cohesion, leadership, and role play that one needs, usually, to have an outstanding team. His
team, almost every year, is very talented and very young--and it's hard to win in the NCAA with a bunch of
freshman/sophs. That's a fact.
Kentucky was also a victim yesterday of a kid who shot out of his mind--made 10 of 20 Trey attempts. He's normally a 38 percent three-point shooter. There's always the risk of running into a team that has a very good day shooting threes.