Russia bounty on US troops

#751
#751
BowlBrother85 said:
Shawn Henry did give sworn testimony that he believes that Russia hacked the DNC. See post #748 of this thread. It's just two posts above this one.
Click to expand...
Why did Shawn Henry say this in sworn testimony?

"There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left."
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002
#752
#752
ajvol01 said:
Why did Shawn Henry say this in sworn testimony?

"There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left."
Click to expand...
That is consistent with what I posted from his testimony, under questioning from Swalwell. Henry believes that Russia exfiltrated the e-mails. He just didn't see it leave. He was being very careful in how he explained what data they had, and what they didn't have. However, his conclusion was that Russia did hack the DNC and those emails did leave.

'... but we believe it left, based on what we saw." - Shawn Henry
 
#753
#753
BowlBrother85 said:
That is consistent with what I posted from his testimony, under questioning from Swalwell. Henry believes that Russia exfiltrated the e-mails. He just didn't see it leave. He was being very careful in how he explained what data they had, and what they didn't have. However, his conclusion was that Russia did hack the DNC and those emails did leave.

'... but we believe it left, based on what we saw." - Shawn Henry
Click to expand...

Belief isn’t proof
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002
#754
#754
ajvol01 said:
Belief isn’t proof
Click to expand...
That makes no sense. LOL.

Shawn Henry believes that Russia hacked the DNC based on the evidence which CrowdStrike collected. Henry was very careful with his testimony, to point out that some of this evidence was circumstantial. I'm not surprised that you would be setting a very high bar for "proof", however. It serves your agenda to side with Russian denials, because that is what your dear leader, Donald Trump, has consistently done. Trump being right is the most important thing to you. It's party over country, and it's pathetic.
 
#757
#757
BowlBrother85 said:
You are cherry picking from Shawn Henry's testimony, to serve an agenda, just as Real Clear Investigations did. How about this testimony?

Rep. Eric Swalwell: "And I just want to be clear, based on the last line of questioning, that you're not saying that circumstantial evidence in this case was weaker than direct evidence. It's just it was only circumstantial evidence that you could rely upon. Is that right?"

Shawn Henry: "Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn't see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw."

Henry is telling Swalwell that he believes that Russia exfiltrated the e-mails. This is not a winning argument for you guys. Russia hacked the DNC... and that has always been CrowdStrike's conclusion - and yes, Shawn Henry did give testimony under oath to such a conclusion.
Click to expand...
I’m cherry picking?! They have no damn idea!

This is the latest nothing burger that you really want to be a something burger instead of just another nothing burger in a long line of nothing burgers. Womp womp.

In fact it isn’t the latest nothing burger. It’s an old moldy nothing burger.
 
#758
#758
NorthDallas40 said:
I’m cherry picking?! They have no damn idea!

The is the latest nothing burger that you really want to be a something burger instead of just another nothing burger in a long line of burning burgers. Womp womp.
Click to expand...
They have more than an idea. They believe Russia hacked the DNC and exfiltrated e-mails. Some of this belief is based on circumstantial evidence, and Henry was very careful to point that out. Reaching such a conclusion based on circumstantial evidence is not unusual either. For the record, the US Intelligence Community, including the Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee, all conducted investigations which reached the same conclusion that CrowdStrike did.
 
#759
#759
BowlBrother85 said:
They have more than an idea. They believe Russia hacked the DNC and exfiltrated e-mails. Some of this belief is based on circumstantial evidence, and Henry was very careful to point that out. Reaching such a conclusion based on circumstantial evidence is not unusual either. For the record, the US Intelligence Community, including the Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee, all conducted investigations which reached the same conclusion that CrowdStrike did.
Click to expand...
🤡

Never give up 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01
#765
#765
BowlBrother85 said:
LOL. Yes, Russia hacked the DNC. That is an undeniable fact. You would only argue otherwise at this point, because you wish to unconditionally support all things Trump... and Trump loves Russia.
Click to expand...
Didn’t the Crowdstrike guy say he didn’t have actual proof of the hack? Yes, I know he said there were things that led them to believe it happened but there was no actual proof.
 
#766
#766
GoBigOrangeUT said:
I don’t mean to impose but it seems you have a little Trump juice dribbling off your chin.
Click to expand...
The way you and BB hang on every little thing related to Trump I’d say you two are the ones doing the slurping around here. It’s cute.
 
#767
#767
hUTch2002 said:
You enjoyed Putin’s bitch Obama so I don’t see why you’d care now if that were even true.
Click to expand...
Because Obama publicly sided with a denial from Vladimir Putin over a conclusion reached by his own Director of National Intelligence and the entire US Intelligence Community, right? Sure thing.
 
#768
#768
I don’t think I’ve defended my wife the way some of you jump to defend a guy you don’t know and wouldn’t even like you. It’s crazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#769
#769
hUTch2002 said:
Didn’t the Crowdstrike guy say he didn’t have actual proof of the hack? Yes, I know he said there were things that led them to believe it happened but there was no actual proof.
Click to expand...
No. Shawn Henry didn't say that at all. Part of the evidence was circumstantial... but it was evidence, nevertheless. Henry made it clear in his testimony that he believes, based on the totality of the evidence, that Russia did hack the DNC.

And once again, that is the same conclusion which the Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee also reached... as well as the entire US Intelligence Community. I can't believe some of you are even still arguing this. There is not one member of the United States Congress, including Republicans, who is denying that Russia hacked the DNC. You are only doing this because it's clearly what Trump wants to believe. This isn't even party over country. It's one lone idiot over country.
 
#774
#774
BowlBrother85 said:
That's a significant revelation. Nobody in the Obama Administration is denying this. They only person denying this... and he called the whole story a hoax, once again today.... is President Donald Trump.
Click to expand...

So what did Obama do about it?

Jack **** obviously. 😂

You libs......whew!
 
#775
#775
Doberman said:
Schiff Briefed on Russia-Taliban Bounty Suspicions in February, Withheld Information From Congress

Another dandy from Pencil Neck.
Click to expand...
Schiff isn't denying the story. What was he supposed to do? Reveal classified information? Schiff doesn't have the authority to take any action on this. Trump does, but he is still calling the entire story a hoax and insisting that Russia hasn't paid bounties to members of the Taliban. You must be able to see the big difference here.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top