Sarah Huckabee-Sanders Asked to Leave Restaurant

#601
#601
volinbham said:
So the restaurant owner was told Sanders was at the restaurant and decided to leave home to go to the restaurant and ultimately ask her to leave. This wasn't a spur of the moment reaction - it was a thought out response.

WTH is wrong with people.
Click to expand...

The Sanders group offered to pay for the meal as well.I

Seems like SHS was very polite.
 
#602
#602
luthervol said:
It seems to be important to you, and many others on here, to convince yourselves that it's about Clinton losing and not about Trump being a repulsive human.

No matter how many different way you try to re-frame the picture, it will still always be Trump.
Click to expand...

You're fooling yourself, Luther. I have no doubt you believe Trump is a repulsive person. I actually agree that he is. But you'd be content if Hillary were POTUS, and she is at least as repulsive(in my mind more so) a person as Trump. So it's not his repulsiveness you reject. You're angry because your repulsive candidate didn't win.

Both parties failed to put up respectable candidates. Unfortunately, between the two, there had to be a winner. If your despicable candidate had won, would you be on here, day after day, expressing your contempt for her? I don't think so.


Tell yourself "It's Trump" as many times as you like, but we both know you're lying to yourself. It's absolutely about the politics involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#604
#604
volinbham said:
I would state this word for word about the Obama administration. The only difference is Obama was more disciplined with his emotions.

The are different in style but not much in terms of divisive substance.

IOW - Trump is just one more in the chain of the problem. Congressional leaders are a huge part of the problem as well.
Click to expand...

That is an understatement to say the least... and Obama didn't bombard you with constant hyperbolic rhetoric on Twitter the way Trump does. He didn't do petty name calling either. He was mostly calm and quiet. You didn't hear from him every damn day like you do Trump.
 
#605
#605
BowlBrother85 said:
That is an understatement to say the least... and Obama didn't bombard you with constant hyperbolic rhetoric on Twitter the way Trump does. He didn't do petty name calling either. He was mostly calm and quiet. You didn't hear from him every damn day like you do Trump.
Click to expand...

He needed alone time with Michael if he wasn’t swinging like a wash woman on the links.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#609
#609
Franklin Pierce said:
The Fascist tactics of the Left are firing up the Trump supporters and they will help to propel President Trump to reelection.
Click to expand...

Here here!! Already happening. I know several disgusted Dims that won’t vote next time. They haven’t left the party, the party left them. They’re embarrassed by the divisive behavior as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#610
#610
BowlBrother85 said:
That is an understatement to say the least... and Obama didn't bombard you with constant hyperbolic rhetoric on Twitter the way Trump does. He didn't do petty name calling either. He was mostly calm and quiet. You didn't hear from him every damn day like you do Trump.
Click to expand...

Bombard? lol. I don't see a single trump tweet unless I want to. I rarely want to so I rarely see them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#611
#611
BowlBrother85 said:
That is an understatement to say the least... and Obama didn't bombard you with constant hyperbolic rhetoric on Twitter the way Trump does. He didn't do petty name calling either. He was mostly calm and quiet. You didn't hear from him every damn day like you do Trump.
Click to expand...

less frequent but still hyperbolic rhetoric and calling out different groups in most of his public comments.

so as I said a difference in style but not really substance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#612
#612
Franklin Pierce said:
The Fascist tactics of the Left are firing up the Trump supporters and they will help to propel President Trump to reelection.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter how "fired up" they are, as long as they can only vote once, the Democratic candidate should have a good shot in 2020. I say this all the time but it's true, Trump won the election (vs an admittedly weak opponent) by virtue of 105,000 votes spread across the 3 states which decided the election:

Michigan - 16 electoral college votes (Trump won by 12,000+)
Wisconsin - 10 electoral college votes (Trump won by 24,000+)
Pennsylvania - 20 electoral college votes (Trump won by 68,000+)

Those 3 states combine to have 46 electoral college votes. Add them to Hillary's total of 226 and you have 272. Take them away from Trump's total of 304 and you have 258. So, basically, Trump defeated a historically weak candidate by slightly over 104,000 votes.

**********************************

And also, look at Trump's poll numbers. His Real Clear Politics average is currently at 43.7%. He is under water in every poll. Even Rasmussen (which leans right) only has him at 46%. There is no indication that he has extended his base of support since the election on November 8, 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#614
#614
BowlBrother85 said:
It doesn't matter how "fired up" they are, as long as they can only vote once, the Democratic candidate should have a good shot in 2020. I say this all the time but it's true, Trump won the election (vs an admittedly weak opponent) by virtue of 105,000 votes spread across the 3 states which decided the election:

Michigan - 16 electoral college votes (Trump won by 12,000+)
Wisconsin - 10 electoral college votes (Trump won by 24,000+)
Pennsylvania - 20 electoral college votes (Trump won by 68,000+)

Those 3 states combine to have 46 electoral college votes. Add them to Hillary's total of 226 and you have 272. Take them away from Trump's total of 304 and you have 258. So, basically, Trump defeated a historically weak candidate by slightly over 104,000 votes.

**********************************

And also, look at Trump's poll numbers. His Real Clear Politics average is currently at 43.7%. He is under water in every poll. Even Rasmussen (which leans right) only has him at 46%. There is no indication that he has extended his base of support since the election on November 8, 2016.
Click to expand...

If I were you I would Stop posting President Trump's poll numbers. Nearly all of the polls (and the corrupt media) predicted Crooked Hillary blowing away Trump in both the electoral college and popular vote in 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#615
#615
Franklin Pierce said:
If I were you I would Stop posting President Trump's poll numbers. Nearly all of the polls (and the corrupt media) predicted Crooked Hillary blowing away Trump in both the electoral college and popular vote in 2016.
Click to expand...

In the immediate days before the election, every poll had tightened significantly and the national poll was within the margin of error. Clinton showed a lead of 3.4% in the RPC national poll on November 7, 2016.. She won the popular vote by 2.1% (48.3% to 46.2%). Some of the state polls were wrong (most notably Pennsylvania and Michigan) and therefore most outlets did have her winning the electoral college vote as well. I understand why you're doing it, but just how wrong the polls were has been overplayed on this forum just a bit as a means of discrediting Trump's low approval ratings.

...and I will point out that Trump is very quick to point to Rasmussen whenever they have him at or near 50%. They currently have him at 46%.
 
#616
#616
Franklin Pierce said:
A Louisiana Burger King reportedly refused to serve two uniformed officers who tried to order food through the drive-thru last month.

According to the Bayou Journal, the Assumption Parish sheriff’s deputies had just finished SWAT training and went to a Burger King in St. Francisville to get some food.

When the police officers tried to order through the drive-thru speaker at the fast food chain, employees allegedly denied their request.

The police department’s public information officer Lonny Cavalier said the deputies tried to order chicken and were told the restaurant was out. They then tried to order Whoppers, to which an employee said they were out of hamburgers.

The uniformed officers asked if the establishment was actually out of the items or if they just did not serve law enforcement, but only received laughter in response, Cavalier wrote in a Letter to the Editor.
Click to expand...

Robbers take notice. You'll have plenty of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#619
#619
BowlBrother85 said:
In the immediate days before the election, every poll had tightened significantly and the national poll was within the margin of error. Clinton showed a lead of 3.4% in the RPC national poll on November 7, 2016.. She won the popular vote by 2.1% (48.3% to 46.2%). Some of the state polls were wrong (most notably Pennsylvania and Michigan) and therefore most outlets did have her winning the electoral college vote as well. I understand why you're doing it, but just how wrong the polls were has been overplayed on this forum just a bit as a means of discrediting Trump's low approval ratings.

...and I will point out that Trump is very quick to point to Rasmussen whenever they have him at or near 50%. They currently have him at 46%.
Click to expand...

He is right folks. The breaks went Trumps way. That in no way is a knock on him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#620
#620
Franklin Pierce said:
A Louisiana Burger King reportedly refused to serve two uniformed officers who tried to order food through the drive-thru last month.

According to the Bayou Journal, the Assumption Parish sheriff’s deputies had just finished SWAT training and went to a Burger King in St. Francisville to get some food.

When the police officers tried to order through the drive-thru speaker at the fast food chain, employees allegedly denied their request.

The police department’s public information officer Lonny Cavalier said the deputies tried to order chicken and were told the restaurant was out. They then tried to order Whoppers, to which an employee said they were out of hamburgers.

The uniformed officers asked if the establishment was actually out of the items or if they just did not serve law enforcement, but only received laughter in response, Cavalier wrote in a Letter to the Editor.
Click to expand...

Well obviously, this is the employees playing games, not the opinion expressed by the Burger King Corporation as a whole.

You can see the distinction, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#622
#622
AirVol said:
Here here!! Already happening. I know several disgusted Dims that won’t vote next time. They haven’t left the party, the party left them. They’re embarrassed by the divisive behavior as well.
Click to expand...

I know multiple republicans that are mortified at what their party has done and find Trump to be an embarrassment. I guess maybe the deck is being reshuffled.
 
#623
#623
utvols88 said:
Bombard? lol. I don't see a single trump tweet unless I want to. I rarely want to so I rarely see them.
Click to expand...

If you spend much time on this site, you see almost all of them. If you watch news (other than Fox) you see a lot of them. I don't tweet but end up seeing most without looking for them.
 
#625
#625
BowlBrother85 said:
Such as what for example?
Click to expand...

I'm not going back to look up examples - there were plenty. Of the top of my head I remember him attacking doctors as greedy, insurers as bad, bankers as bad, political opponents as enemies, Republicans as hostage takers, any number of groups as racist...

I'm sure you remember it differently
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top