Sarah Palin's interview with Katie Couric

[KB5252]

I haven't heard Obama use a one line cut-down, have you? And as to Palin, she's doing the damage to herself.
I was talking about the poster I responded to, not Obama.
You ignorant slut (you, not her).





Reagan was smarter than people give him credit for (until the end when he kind of faded a bit), and particularly in playing the game with the Soviets. sticking to his guns on Star Wars and running them into the ground economically.

He was proactive with the rest of the world, reached out to them and most importantly was consistent with his ideology and world view. With the current president, we've lacked that solid sense of purpose.

Presidents prior to 1960 are tought to include in this discussion because the world, the economy, and international relations have changed so dramatically in that time. Having a League of Nations, or U.N., after the experiences of a world war made much more sense then than perhaps now for a lot of reasons and, at the time, served a useful purpose.

See above: Trailer tramp!

 

[KingNick865]

When I think of Reagan, here's two things I think of.

Oh, you know I'm only kidding. I don't know anything much about Reagan's administration, other than the Star Wars missile defense program, and his assasination attempt, considering that Reagan's administration ended two years before I was even born.

 

[BigPapaVol]

When I think of Reagan, here's two things I think of.


Oh, you know I'm only kidding. I don't know anything much about Reagan's administration, other than the Star Wars missile defense program, and his assasination attempt.

pretty telling.

 

[TennNC]

I am basing it on the fact that he won the Dem primary based upon almost nothing.

He has faced a few questions to date, but nothing of the type that Gibson put on Palin.

Warren was in a debate format and O'Reilly was just pathetic.

He has been better vetted now, but not one helluva lot. He economic ideas have yet to be even remotely tested, but it's probably his most glaring weakness. The absurdity that it's a strength because the Rs now pale by comparison makes no sense to me.

you didn't answer the question.

who has protected Obama from what?

 

[TennNC]

I don't know anything much about Reagan's administration, other than the Star Wars missile defense program, and his assasination attempt, considering that Reagan's administration ended two years before I was even born.

His mind went long before that.

 

[VolBeef88]

Hate isn't the right word. And I'm definitely sure that others have gotten this much heat, and much more.

I fear a Palin presidency. I don't fear Palin as VP - that would be like fearing our second string qb. it doesn't matter until the first string qb goes down.

I don't hate her, actually. I bet she's pretty pleasant and admirable on many fronts. I have many friends and family members I disagree with vehemently on many issues, yet I love and respect them and enjoy their company.

As the leader of my country, however, I don't think she's the best we've got. And I happen to disagree with her on many topics. I also disagree with McCain on many topics, but I also think he's qualified to be president.

I blame McCain for picking someone who's not qualified to take over should he die in office. Bloomberg, Ridge, Liebermann - any of those would be qualified, regardless of their policies. She clearly is like a deer in headlights right now, and you can't protect her forever.

There is pure hatred.

 

[TennNC]

There is pure pity.

fyp

 

[BigPapaVol]

you didn't answer the question.

who has protected Obama from what?

the MSM has protected Obama from any real questioning about his pronouncements on Iraq, foreign policy and the economy. His ludicrous 2,000 member foreign policy team should have had him laughed out of the primary, but he has survived it because nobody has been willing (and he hasn't truly been available) to crucify him (allegory intended) for it.

 

[hohenfelsvol]

Out of curiosity. How many interviews has Biden given to the main stream media?

 

[TennNC]

Out of curiosity. How many interviews has Biden given to the main stream media?

can you not look it up yourself?

 

[TennNC]

the MSM has protected Obama from any real questioning about his pronouncements on Iraq, foreign policy and the economy. His ludicrous 2,000 member foreign policy team should have had him laughed out of the primary, but he has survived it because nobody has been willing (and he hasn't truly been available) to crucify him (allegory intended) for it.

so says BPV, so it is!

 

[JZVOL]

How the hell is Biden more suited to take over than Palin?

I hate to say it but I would say there is just as good a chance if not more of Obama dying in office than McCain and then you are stuck with a schmuck who thought he saw FDR on TV in '29.

 

[hohenfelsvol]

can you not look it up yourself?

So you don't know and you make such a big deal out of Palin. Typical. Connect the dots.

 

[TennNC]

How the hell is Biden more suited to take over than Palin?

I hate to say it but I would say there is just as good a chance if not more of Obama dying in office than McCain and then you are stuck with a schmuck who thought he saw FDR on TV in '29.

get back to work.

 

[BigPapaVol]

so says BPV, so it is!

you freaking asked why I thought it.

Why this kind of silly response? Is something materially untrue or does it just not fit your worldview?

 

[JZVOL]

get back to work.

As soon as you come back to earth.

 

[TennNC]

So you don't know and you make such a big deal out of Palin. Typical.

Typical what?

Here's how you can do research and find out first-hand what the answers to your questions are. For example, with the question you posed previously:

Step 1: Type "biden press interviews" into the blank space at the top of the screen at Google

Step 2: look for the answer.

Step 3: read the answer.

OR, you could ask people on here and then either refute or believe what you hear from an anonymous source. So, I'll give you the answer I read using the methodology above: 89 interviews.

 

[hohenfelsvol]

Typical what?

Here's how you can do research and find out first-hand what the answers to your questions are. For example, with the question you posed previously:

Step 1: Type "biden press interviews" into the blank space at the top of the screen at Google

Step 2: look for the answer.

Step 3: read the answer.

OR, you could ask people on here and then either refute or believe what you hear from an anonymous source. So, I'll give you the answer I read using the methodology above: 89 interviews.

Again, typical non-answer.

 

[BigPapaVol]

Typical what?

Here's how you can do research and find out first-hand what the answers to your questions are. For example, with the question you posed previously:

Step 1: Type "biden press interviews" into the blank space at the top of the screen at Google

Step 2: look for the answer.

Step 3: read the answer.

OR, you could ask people on here and then either refute or believe what you hear from an anonymous source. So, I'll give you the answer I read using the methodology above: 89 interviews.

the awesome part is that Google is always right. That's why Obama's a better candidate than McCain.

 

[hohenfelsvol]

the awesome part is that Google is always right. That's why Obama's a better candidate than McCain.

Wikipedia rules.

 

[TennNC]

you freaking asked why I thought it.

Why this kind of silly response? Is something materially untrue or does it just not fit your worldview?

I'm not looking for your gut feeling about how the media has treated Obama. I'm looking for evidence to support your point. Examples where the media fell short. Examples where they let him off the hook. An article from someone else who can provide examples would suffice. I like links. You saying it's so doesn't help me buy it.

The fact that Palin had hardly conducted an interview or done a press conference or granted any access at all is evidence that the campaign is protecting her.

 

[TennNC]

Again, typical non-answer.

answer: 89.

Eighty-nine.

8 x 10 + 9.

 

[TennNC]

the awesome part is that Google is always right. That's why Obama's a better candidate than McCain.

Google is neither right nor wrong. It doesn't judge. It lets you see all of the potential options for finding answers to simple questions like the one hohen posed to the geniuses on here. And it's up to hohen to read it, note the source, judge for him/her self and get the answer he's searching for.

BTW, the answer is 89 press interviews.

 

[TennNC]

Again, typical non-answer.

again, what do you mean by typical?

what is typical of what?

 

[hohenfelsvol]

again, what do you mean by typical?

what is typical of what?

Some of what would be taking that articles quoting 80 plus interviews at face value. What the heck qualifies as an interview. Two sentences on Hannity?

The fact that Palin had hardly conducted an interview or done a press conference or granted any access at all is evidence that the campaign is protecting her.

The first interview with Gibson was delivered in a condescending and venomous manner on his part. Looking down through his glasses, misquoting her and asking misstating questions and being an a-hole when she didn't get what he was hinting about. I wouldn't want her doing many interviews with some of those schmucks either. The left socialistic hags on the View about attacked McCain on every level and Whoopi even hinted that he would let slavery come back. My strategy too would be to minimize contact with the left media. Plain and simple.