hohenfelsvol
How uwe doo-in?!?
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
- Messages
- 50,392
- Likes
- 2,738
In all honesty, I'd have to agree with the decision. They shouldn't have to play that many opponents off a bye week in a row.
Opponents coming off bye weeks since 2007. Add five to Bama if you count the initial 2010 schedule (USCe, UT, LSU, Ole Miss, and Auburn).
Hard to say the SEC office "favors" Bama. Looks like they're in love with Arky and SC.
Alabama - 11
Arkansas - 0
Auburn - 3
Florida - 4
Georgia - 2
Kentucky - 2
LSU - 4
Mississippi - 1
Mississippi State - 1
South Carolina - 0
Tennessee - 4
Vanderbilt - 3
BTW, greetings VolNation. I'm an admitted lurker. I come in peace. eace2:
:lol: thick skin helps.
I think bama should get a break here as well, but id like to see some action for scheduling standards by the sec. x amount of conference opponents coming of byes, everybody gets one, etc. shouldn't be too difficult.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
+1
I agree, but I wonder if the league office (I forget where it's located) would care if another member school not coming off a national title and not named Alabama found itself in the same situation.
Opponents coming off bye weeks since 2007. Add five to Bama if you count the initial 2010 schedule (USCe, UT, LSU, Ole Miss, and Auburn).
Hard to say the SEC office "favors" Bama. Looks like they're in love with Arky and SC.
Alabama - 11
Arkansas - 0
Auburn - 3
Florida - 4
Georgia - 2
Kentucky - 2
LSU - 4
Mississippi - 1
Mississippi State - 1
South Carolina - 0
Tennessee - 4
Vanderbilt - 3
BTW, greetings VolNation. I'm an admitted lurker. I come in peace. eace2: