I'm saying that ESPN and CBS would say that they add no new TV sets and would not pay an extra nickel on the TV contract if GTU joined. Which means everyone makes less money.
Or it can come out of UT's cut.
I don't give a crap about money.....
Everything is about money these days, I want southeren schools in the SOUTH eastern conference. Mizzo or A&M are not southern schools. So might as well add Cal now.
I think the SEC needs a NC and a VA team.
VA Tech and NC State would be good additions, imo.
I think the SEC needs a NC and a VA team.
VA Tech and NC State would be good additions, imo.
I'd say these 2 have the best shot. It opens up 2 new markets.
Georgia Tech, Louisville, Clemson, and FSU likely have pretty much a zero shot at getting in because they're already in an SEC state.
Plus they already play their SEC rival every year anyway.
NC State is might be a bit less likely than a lot of people seem to want to make it.
Of NC State's 13 member Board of Trustees that would vote on making such a move, 8 of those members are trustees elected by UNC's own Board of Governors, or in other words 8 members are put on that board by UNC (also another 1 of the 13 is a student government member, who most likely wouldn't have a vote if Missouri is of any indication).
Essentially, UNC appears to have a say (through the almost 3/4ths of the board they put in place) in the kinds of major decisions NC State makes...which makes sense, as another writer put it: "NCSU is a 'constituent institution' of the University of North Carolina system. In other words, the schools have a connection. Were not talking Texas and Texas A&M, here."
Unless the ACC were already falling apart and UNC already in another conference, I'm not sure the members put in place by the school would just (or maybe even could just) give NC State the go to simply up and leave the ACC, possibly hurting UNC in the process.
(A lot of the NC State theory, which Clay Travis might have been the starter or at least majorly pushing the idea initially, came from the assumption that they must be in a situation of being "sick of being in big brother's shadow" since the recent addition, Texas A&M, had that kind of relationship with more recognized state school, Texas)
FWIW, 8/12 (not counting the student) is 2/3.
I have thought the NCSU to the SEC talk has been largely because people have assumed we cannot get UNC and view NCSU as the best available alternative for entry into NC.
I have decided the worst thing that could ever happen to the longterm future of the Tennessee football program is an addition of teams in the states of NC and Va.
Longterm those teams would lock down most of the talent from those states a la SC and A&M.
Once we get rolling again, we will dominate those two states if they stay SEC free states.
I hope the SEC expands west if it does anything (OU, OSU)
Clemson and FSU would be very good additions. The only other place I could think of expanding to add to the conference would be further into Texas and including the fakeUT, but their ego is so big that they'd never come into the conference. They think they deserve to be independent.
I dunno that Clemson would be a good add, but I'd be OK with them. Texas definitely not.
How's Greenville, by the way? I've possibly got a job interview down there in the next week.