Don't know if it's already been posted:
http://www.secdigitalnetwork.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=rhO-2F4ZGJk=&tabid=712&mid=4578
That bracket makes it very obvious how a team must get through the east to be successful. Amazing.
Don't know if it's already been posted:
http://www.secdigitalnetwork.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=rhO-2F4ZGJk=&tabid=712&mid=4578
thanks for the link. Its now printed, and posted on the bulletin at work (here in Alabama ) heheheDon't know if it's already been posted:
http://www.secdigitalnetwork.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=rhO-2F4ZGJk=&tabid=712&mid=4578
I recognize this is not how it works, but wouldn't it make more sense for #1 to be in the same side of the bracket as #3, rather than 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3? I just say that because I would much rather be playing Florida than Vandy in the semis. I know it's hard to beat a good team three times in a year (whether or not FL is a good team is debatable), but I think beating Vandy on a neutral floor could be a tall order.
That said, GBO! I hope we can keep this streak alive and get an at large bid.
And remember, our away/neutral record isn't stellar
that wouldnt be fair to the 1.
same concept as NCAA seeding, the 1 is supposed to get the easiest possible road.
That never made sense to me. I've always felt that the #1 should have the toughest road to prove they are indeed #1 and the worst should playing games that gradually get harder to prove that which each gradually harder win that they deserve to stay.
I'm not sure if someone already said this verbatim, but the reason for a 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 is because it rewards the higher team. Every tournament bracket is set up to give the higher seed the easiest route to the finals. That's not always the case, but that is the reason behind it.
Considering the only 3 neutral games were played in December in Maui, I feel pretty good about the tourney. UT played pretty well with a neutral crowd and that was back when they weren't really very good. With the exception of LSU and UK, none of the tourney games are going to be decidedly one way, in regards to fan support.( as long as UK fans don't get a bug up their collective butts and start cheering for whomever UT is playing, that would suck)
UK fans heads are in the clouds, they see this tournament as an exhibition. They have already swept the SEC, I doubt Tennessee is even in their rearview mirror. If we do some work and get to the finals mabe then we will suddenly appear to UK fans. A lot of work to be done.
It is my understanding that UK fans take the SEC tourny very very seriously, many of them people that go will take the tourny week as their Spring Break. I have also heard that unlike most other fan bases UK fans are known to stay and watch other games and do so in significant numbers. I have also been lead to believe that they will cheer for whomever takes their fancy. If these things are true, it would suck to go out to what is suppossed to be a neutral site game and suddenly find a few thousand bored UK fans deciding to cheer for your opponent.
That never made sense to me. I've always felt that the #1 should have the toughest road to prove they are indeed #1 and the worst should playing games that gradually get harder to prove that which each gradually harder win that they deserve to stay.
Ok. I'm going to skip all the BS that happens on these threads. I just have one simple question. What time do we play for the SEC Championship on Sunday? Or an even better question...What time can I start celebrating our SEC Championship on Sunday?
Go Vols! Beat em all! Leave no doubt! :rock:
Just because Kentucky is head and shoulders above the rest of the SEC (and the country for that matter) doesn't mean that everyone else in the SEC is equal. On a neutral floor, I would say Ole Miss would beat Auburn 8 out of 10 times. Auburn has a chance, but Ole Miss is definitely a better team.Who says its going to be ole miss? Outside of UK everything is pretty much equal with nobody having homecourt advantage. Not saying they will but Auburn very easily could beat Ole Miss.