Orangeburst
Attention all Planets of the Solar Federation
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 46,955
- Likes
- 107,325
I think the best thing would be for a bunch of the engineers to buy it as junk get rid of the MBA finance bunch and start making an airplane again rather than focus on false profits.Yeah, fair enough. They haven't innovated for decades. They are to Airbus as NASA is to SpacEx.
Actually I think Boeing's best move would be to split into about 3-4 different companies.
If they separated their airliner division I doubt it could compete with Airbus, at least for the first 10 years or so.Yeah, fair enough. They haven't innovated for decades. They are to Airbus as NASA is to SpacEx.
Actually I think Boeing's best move would be to split into about 3-4 different companies.
Interesting. Why would you say that? I don't think they could because they haven't really done that much since the 787, and that thing was a disaster because they went all oneworld and had so many parts built elsewhere. I guess maybe I am answering my own question. They need to put the engineers back in charge and move the HQ back to where they build the machines, and that would take time.If they separated their airliner division I doubt it could compete with Airbus, at least for the first 10 years or so.
You pretty much covred it. Their management doesn't seem to know nearly as much about their own product as they do about finance, and recent results indicate they're not so great at finance. They need to fix that.Interesting. Why would you say that? I don't think they could because they haven't really done that much since the 787, and that thing was a disaster because they went all oneworld and had so many parts built elsewhere. I guess maybe I am answering my own question. They need to put the engineers back in charge and move the HQ back to where they build the machines, and that would take time.
how these Board members still have jobs is amazing to me.Interesting. Why would you say that? I don't think they could because they haven't really done that much since the 787, and that thing was a disaster because they went all oneworld and had so many parts built elsewhere. I guess maybe I am answering my own question. They need to put the engineers back in charge and move the HQ back to where they build the machines, and that would take time.
It’s happening across the entire defense aerospace industry. Decades ago senior management was grown in house and even non engineers understood the product and the in house process. That is largely not the case across the entire industry now. And HR and finance has the executive suite’s ear dictating to engineering how they will design the next product and processes. It’s absolutely moronic.Interesting. Why would you say that? I don't think they could because they haven't really done that much since the 787, and that thing was a disaster because they went all oneworld and had so many parts built elsewhere. I guess maybe I am answering my own question. They need to put the engineers back in charge and move the HQ back to where they build the machines, and that would take time.