Heil gs, the lone beacon of truth that we sheep may be guided by this shepherd.
I declare no Jew or Christian has ever committed a war crime, nor purged anyone on basis of faith for all Jews and Christians are of good, and Moslems are of evil.
And also sets Christians back decades at a time with each and every hypocritical post.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Tell me what is hypocritical about telling the truth
about what happened in the former Yugoslavia vs
the moslem propaganda published in what we call
the media, (which is a sorry excuse for finding out
the truth about anything)?
"The man who reads nothing is better informed than
the man who reads only newspapers."
Thomas Jefferson
If you want to see where Christians have been set
back, visit Kosovo or Bosnia or Lebanon or any other
country to have the misfortune to have a sizable
moslem population, even better get back to me after
visiting some country that has over 90% moslem
population and tell me how much you advanced
Christianity.
Here is some interesting reading for you:
Brigitte Gabriel: Because they hate.
Quoting something about reading newspapers from the late 18th/early 19th century is very relative in the year 2011. They haven't progressed at all.
The Anglo-Americans would thus be induced to co-operate in the destruction of the very government which they had recognized.
-------------------------------------
Tito felt no such compunction, and, indeed, had everything to gain by provoking reprisals in his rivalÂ’s areas. Is not misery the seedbed of Communism anyway?
The Germans were quick to seize the opportunity of sowing the seeds of civil war, and killed first hundreds, and finally thousands of innocent Serbs for any small act of sabotage.
This policy was not nearly so marked in the Tito areas. To their eternal shame, the Anglo-Americans allowed themselves to be persuaded by the short-term military advantage of switching their supplies and propaganda support from Mihailovich to Tito, although this ensured the ultimate rulers of Yugoslavia being anti-British Communists. British arms and munitions were largely used against the Mihailovich forces which continued to rescue and evacuate hundreds of American airmen.
------------------------------------
The GeneralÂ’s plan was to organize his forces for a general uprising on the day of the Allied landing. It was difficult for him to understand why he should be called upon to sacrifice his men prematurely when every other resistance movement in Europe was being urged to lie low until Der Tag.
The followers of Mihailovich were for the most part Serbs and intensely pro-British, thanks to their memories of the Kaiser war, when the Serbian Army was re-equipped by and fought alongside the British Army.
----------------------------------
The Communist intimates of Tito felt no sort of friendship for the representatives of ‘British Imperialism’ and only preserved appearances until such time as they had built themselves up with Anglo-American arms and supplies brought in at the cost of Anglo-American lives. All pretence of friendship was dropped once the Allies wished to land in Yugoslavia, when they found their entrance to the country practically banned.
----------------------------
It certainly should, but the B.B.C., which delighted in creating the Great Tito Legend, is no fitting instrument for the purpose. Its voice would drown in the blood of Mihailovich.
Imagine, in conclusion, what were the feelings of Major Greenlees and his brother officers when, living under the faithful care and protection of the Chetniks, they heard the B.B.C. daily attacking those same Chetniks and their leader!
Here is a historical note for your, Dec. 7, 1946. (a short essay)
General Draza Mihailovich: THE MYSTERY OF MIHAILOVICH - Was General Draza Mihailovich a Traitor or a Patriot?
Other books on the topic:
David MartinÂ’s "Ally Betrayed" - 1947
Major Lees; "The Rape of Serbia" - 1988
Also; "The Forgotten 500"
So you disagree and think newspapers are just as bad as they were in the 18th/19th centuries?
No I don't agree, they are worse, FAR worse today.
That's one big reason they are all going broke.
Same goes for the alphabet news media.
Hardly anyone watches network and cable news
these days.
They so reek with bias that even the mentally challenged
have no problem recognizing it.
![]()
Remember Duranty claiming all was well in the Ukraine
when millions were dying from what you call famine
but was actually a planned genocide to further
socialists plans.
They are biased....but no where near where they were historically. Thinking they are worse is naive at best.
They are biased....but no where near where they were historically. Thinking they are worse is naive at best.
Confronting your own false beliefs can be a
daunting task, even more so when coupled
with an overwhelming level of corruption in
the world around you, steering you the wrong
way. Coming to grips with the latter can end
your days of innocence about mass media
and politics.
Yes they were biased but in the 18th and 19th
centuries there were publications that were biased
in either direction but it has become so that all
major media is biased in only one direction and
have the power to misrepresent events in such
a way as to paint a very false picture as was the
case in oth the Ukraine and more recently in the
Balkans.
Over a half century ago I was in a postition to
read the raw AP wire and to read that first then
read the print media after most stories were
completely spiked and those printed, heavily edited,
it was readily evident that there was some sort
of agenda being promoted.
So I am not naive to have made the statement
I made, on the contrary, I know what I'm talking
about.
Yes they were biased but in the 18th and 19th
centuries there were publications that were biased
in either direction but it has become so that all
major media is biased in only one direction and
have the power to misrepresent events in such
a way as to paint a very false picture as was the
case in oth the Ukraine and more recently in the
Balkans.
Over a half century ago I was in a postition to
read the raw AP wire and to read that first then
read the print media after most stories were
completely spiked and those printed, heavily edited,
it was readily evident that there was some sort
of agenda being promoted.
So I am not naive to have made the statement
I made, on the contrary, I know what I'm talking
about.
You said they are worse now. So, no. No you don't.
If and when you can either prove either that Kissinger was a tool of the major media outlets or that he was ignorant or incompetent, I will take his word regarding the Serbs over yours.
If you cannot, then shut your trap.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
At the end of WWII a friend of mine was commander
of a US base in Germany.
He was assigned a corporal by the name of Henry
Kissinger with the instructions; 'give him a job in
which he can't get in trouble,' and so assingned him
the duty of dining room orderly.
The men promptly dubbed him 'chow hall Hank.'
After a couple of months chow hall Hank was given
a three or four month leave of absense during which
he visited the Rockefellers and some of the oligarchs
of Europe.
When he returned to duty his position was 'governor
of the military district.'
Some promotion huh??
Kissinger is and always has been a tool to the
Rockefellers and their ilk and so is the media.
If you take Kissinger at his word then you are
the one who needs to shut your yap.
Here is one of Kissinger's famous quotes; "What is
illegal we do immediately, what is unconstitutional
takes a bit longer."
The real reason the Serbs arressted Mladic was
so that they could improve their chances of being
accepted into the EU which is controlled by wealthy
elitists which pull Kissinger's puppet strings.
Perhaps you can tell me when Oric will be prosecuted
for his many brutal crimes????
He was assigned a corporal by the name of Henry
Kissinger with the instructions; 'give him a job in
which he can't get in trouble,' and so assingned him
the duty of dining room orderly.
The men promptly dubbed him 'chow hall Hank.'
After a couple of months chow hall Hank was given
a three or four month leave of absense during which
he visited the Rockefellers and some of the oligarchs
of Europe.
When he returned to duty his position was 'governor
of the military district.'
Some promotion huh??
Fictional anecdotes included - he's still wrong.
And you are completely comfortable fabricating stories where the actual course of events and Kissinger's War experience is public record? What a jackwagon.