Shooting in El Paso

[37L1]

I've never said his views didn't, but if we're using Twitter as evidence, then you are the one picking only one story to glorify politics. They both had politics on their twitter is all I'm saying.

Yes but "his" guy was much more baddest than the other guy so LG wins.

That about right LG?

 

[joevol33]

Yes but "his" guy was much more baddest than the other guy so LG wins.

That about right LG?

And this guy is still alive is the argument, I'm sure it has nothing to do with his particular political views.

 

[Smartvol17]

I did and it says the only reason to have guns is to form a militia. Each individual person is not their own militia.

 

[37L1]

I did and it says the only reason to have guns is to form a militia. Each individual person is not their own militia.

Seriously. Read the SCOTUS rulings before you embarrass yourself any further.

 

[joevol33]

I did and it says the only reason to have guns is to form a militia. Each individual person is not their own militia.

Me, my wife, my kids, we're the militia in our subdivision in northeast Georgia, so there ya go.

 

[utvolpj]

Your initial response to me was your white knight response to a post I made about Luther. You don't even know what your arguing about. You're just being your normal ass self.

Your post outlined the ideas of his you found distasteful. I simply pointed out that you support those depending on the source. You then started calling me a liberal and running away from providing any proof

 

[Smartvol17]

Hmm...maybe you should read some real history about our infantryman holding off Panzer units and get back to us on that.

That’s 1940s technology. Good luck with a modern military.

 

[Smartvol17]

Me, my wife, my kids, we're the militia in our subdivision in northeast Georgia, so there ya go.

Scary you see yourself as such.

 

[C-south]

That’s 1940s technology. Good luck with a modern military.

You a veteran?

 

[Smartvol17]

Seriously. Read the SCOTUS rulings before you embarrass yourself any further.

I disagree with most if not all of them pertaining to guns.

 

[joevol33]

Scary you see yourself as such.

Even more scary that you can't detect sarcasm. I do own guns though, so boo!

 

[37L1]

That’s 1940s technology. Good luck with a modern military.

Do you think there might be a problem with the "modern military" if they are asked to assault the citizens of their own country over something like weapons confiscation resistance?

 

[Smartvol17]

You a veteran?

No, but even someone like me knows you can’t take on a modem military with standard assault rifles. They won’t help you there or anywhere else for that matter

 

[GreyWolf1129]

I disagree with most if not all of them pertaining to guns.

Travelocity.com

Lots of flights to other places where you would agree with their stance on gun control.

 

[GreyWolf1129]

Scary you see yourself as such.

Only to those who would offer him or his family harm.

 

[Smartvol17]

Do you think there might be a problem with the "modern military" if they are asked to assault the citizens of their own country over something like weapons confiscation resistance?

I do agree our military is overblown, we should cut the budget by at least half and leave all foreign occupied bases.

 

[Smartvol17]

Travelocity.com

Lots of flights to other places where you would agree with their stance on gun control.

I was in the UK for a little while a little while ago, never once of heard of a shooting there

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[joevol33]

No, but even someone like me knows you can’t take on a modem military with standard assault rifles. They won’t help you there or anywhere else for that matter

Seeing how theres no such thing as assault rifles, what's your point?

 

[GreyWolf1129]

I was in the UK for a little while a little while ago, never once of heard of a shooting there

Well, there you go.

 

[joevol33]

I was in the UK for a little while a little while ago, never once of heard of a shooting there

You're trolling now, or you're purposely over looking certain attacks.

 

[37L1]

I disagree with most if not all of them pertaining to guns.

You didn't read them did you? You have no idea what the arguments or the findings were do you? Just the fact that ownership is allowed is enough for you.

Whether you agree or disagree is immaterial. It's how the law is interpreted and sets precedent. That's the way it works, until the 2nd is repealed or seriously modified and upheld by the Supreme Court. Until then, well, the best I can say for you, is that you are willfully ignorant. But be of good cheer, you are not alone in that regard.

 

[Caculator]

I was in the UK for a little while a little while ago, never once of heard of a shooting there

What about stabbings and acid attacks

 

[DynaLo]

That’s 1940s technology. Good luck with a modern military.

Wow and I bet they used 1940's firearms as well.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

What about stabbings and acid attacks

*BINGO >>>> Winner of the $5 dollar KFC's Box chicken dinner.