Lexvol
I'm Your Huckleberry
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 22,284
- Likes
- 241
Originally posted by holdemvol@Sep 20, 2005 3:05 PM
I agree that falls ultimately on the shoulders of the coaching staff, and of course I would like to see our talent better utilized. I just don't think you can justify coaching changes with our win record. It would be great if we scored 70 ppg but I would bet that if you go on any fan board of any team you will here about how some coach sucks. I think maybe UT fans are spoiled because of the success we have had and need to come to the realization that this coaching staff has done a better job than any other since Fulmer took over. No coaching staff is perfect, there will always be strengths and weaknesses. My problem much like jwells is that anytime ANYTHING does not go our way there are an amazing number of posters calling for Randy Sanders' head. Yesterday for instance I read on this board that the special teams errors saturday were RS fault because "his offense broke down...special teams should not have had to kick" Now how ridiculous is that? Special teams should never have to play? If you go back and watch the games most of the games we lost have been because of lack of execution and stupid mistakes. I do realize that this is in the end the responsibility of the coaching staff, but that ends with Fulmer, not Sanders. Anyone who wants Fulmer gone needs thier head examined, and while there are not as many Fulmer bashers on here as Sanders bashers there are more than enough. Someone made a good example out of Nebraska on another thread...they let a winning coach go and look where they are now....a joke. I am just tired of win or lose hearing about how our coaching sucks. There are some on this very board who even if we hang up 60 on LSU will still find a reason to start a "fire Sanders" thread. I guess it just gets old.
[snapback]147688[/snapback]
I think that there is truth on both sides of the argument. The reason that most people complain, including myself, after two poor performances is because of what we have been hearing.
In the past when the offense has underperformed it has BASICALLY been blamed on a shortage of talent. Now the offense is supposedly loaded with talent, and perception is that is still underachieving. This coupled with the fact that other OCs and HCs (Ky when Mumme was there, Louisville along with other examples have done more with arguably less talent due to scheme) leads the fire RS group believe that the Vols are in a pattern of mediocirity. We should be better than our 107th ranked offense in the country. When you have the Vols talent, and see what other coaches are doing with their talent it leads us to believe that replacing RS would make us NC contenders much more consitently, and attract much greater talent.