James Zogby: Ellison Challenges Bachmann: Put Up or Shut Up
Rogers is the Chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
since our founding, America has always enjoyed a good witch hunt. Oddly enough they all end up in history books and the people reading them laughing at the ignorance. Looks like Bachmann skipped that class
"The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see."
Ayn Rand
Obviously you've skipped some classes yourself.
She is an idiot. That being said, the Muslim Brotherhood is a very bad group. They were the inspiration for the formation of Al Qaeda.
Why do you say she is an idiot?
I'm not sure she ever opened an American history book, much less attended a class. How anyone takes her seriously is beyond me.
I'm not sure you ever opened up a world history book.
"We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality."
Ayn Rand
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/nonie-darwish/huma-abedins-mothers-extreme-islamist-agenda/
Now let us examine Humas mothers history and activities. Dr. Saleha Mahmood Abedin has been identified in Saudi Arabia as one of the founding members of the Muslim Sisterhood, a Muslim Brotherhood womens group. This is the same group that half of Egypt was too scared to vote for and that was criminalized for many decades in Egypt for its subversiveness and terror activities. Dr. Abedin is no ordinary Muslim woman, but an activist who supports Sharia law. She is also a long-time chairperson of the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC). Now let us examine what that group is doing in Egypt today and why many Egyptians are afraid of its activities and are strongly denouncing it.
The last elections in Egypt have proved that half of Egypt is afraid of the Muslim Brotherhood and does not want to live under Sharia, but that is not the same concern of Abedins organization (IICWC), which is advocating Sharia law. The IICW contributed greatly to fear of its agenda after a recent publication in Arabic on its website. The following topics were discussed, among others, suggesting the annulment of Egyptian moderate laws, which would be replaced by Sharia laws. Below are some of the positions that appeared in the IICWC publication:
* The IICWC position that the current laws criminalizing female genital mutilation be revoked.
* The IICWCs position demanding that the laws forbidding child marriage below the age of eighteen be revoked. No new minimum marriage age was given; the group stated that the marriage standard depends on the financial and mental ability and not dependent on a specific age.
* The IICWCs positions, as reported, demanding that the laws forbidding marital rape be revoked and that polygamy is a right for men.
* The IICWCs position that a health check-up before marriage be revoked since it is against religion and should not be part of the marriage contract.
* The IICWCs position that criminal responsibility triggering at age 18 be reduced to age 15.
* The IICWCs position revokes the right of a woman to register her newborn by herself for a birth certificate because Sharia states that a childs lineage is given strictly to the father and his paternal line. The child belongs to the father even if it was the product of adultery.
* The IICWCs position revokes the criminalization of physical and mental abuse of parents against children, so long as the punishment does not cause a permanent deformity or the beating is too extreme.
Above are the values that Huma Abedins mother believes in and that her organization is trying to impose on the Egyptian public after the revolution. Huma did not keep a distance from her mothers activities when she introduced Secretary Clinton to her activist mother. During Clintons visit to Saudi Arabia, the US Secretary of State visited and spoke at the Islamic college of Dar El-Hekma together with Huma, where Dr. Saleha Abedin was a vice-dean and one of its founders.
-------------------------
When it comes to politics, appearances do count and Huma and Clintons defenders need to understand that. Rep. Bachmann and her colleagues should be applauded for pushing the alarm button, not just regarding Abedin, but regarding many others in our government, to alert us all to a possible security threat from the Muslim Brotherhood and the civilization jihad they aspire for in America.
GS: "Blah blah blah, being a Moslem is anti-constitutional, blah blah blah, some more righteous stuff about the constitution that has no basis in reality."
Just beating him to the punch so we can get it over with.
Blah, blah, blah yoiurself.
McCarthy was right BTW!
Everything he said proved to be true.
The last two senators who supported him were JFK and Robert Kennedy, I guess you are familiar with what eventually happened to them?
So is there any truth to it?
The response we have is a character attack upon Bachman.
What we do't have is answers to her questions.
You be the judge.
FWIW, back when Huma was Hitlery's assistant and Hitlery was running for office, it was required information that Hitlery divulge what she was paying Huma Abedin.
It was a paltry sum but then one of the magazines put Huma on the cover as one of the best dressed women in Washington.
There was no way she could pay for those togs on the money she was getting from Hitlery.
At the time I surmised that Abedin was being paid by the Saudi intelligence service but now we can see that it wasn't Saudi intelligence but the muslim brotherhood who was giving her the money to be the bessed dressed woman in Washington. (or it could have been Bubba, you know how he is.)
How about this:?
All day long I've tried to reply to you in the pic thread.
Evidently I'm not allowed to post in that thread.
Anyway I was going to ask you if the following would go over well:
Whatcha' think?
neither should Bachmann but it happens
Why not?
If studying or understanding history is required there should be a flashing vacancy sign on the Hill.
In March 1785, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams
went to negotiate with Tripolis envoy to London,
Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul
Rahman Adja). Upon inquiring concerning the grounds
of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had
done them no injury, the ambassador replied:
"It was written in the Koran, that all nations which
had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners,
whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to
plunder and enslave; and that every muslim who
was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. "
Two hundred years later not one word of the Koran
has changed, nor has it's interpretaion by islamic
scholars and their plan is still the same.
