Matt2496
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2016
- Messages
- 14,036
- Likes
- 22,211
It's likely the same design they have been using for close to a year.What team of idiots designed the support structure that collapsed? Was their calculator off by a digit? I'm an electrical guy and I've never designed anything that would melt if pushed past 200% of the design load. Whoever the chief mechanical engineer was, is a serious dumbass or it was put together wrong.
What team of idiots designed the support structure that collapsed? Was their calculator off by a digit? I'm an electrical guy and I've never designed anything that would melt if pushed past 200% of the design load. Whoever the chief mechanical engineer was, is a serious dumbass or it was put together wrong.
Could be wear and tear.What team of idiots designed the support structure that collapsed? Was their calculator off by a digit? I'm an electrical guy and I've never designed anything that would melt if pushed past 200% of the design load. Whoever the chief mechanical engineer was, is a serious dumbass or it was put together wrong.
OMG, don't venture into the World Trade Center conspiracy threads. I tried to make that argument and was shot down like an F35 taking out a WW2 Zero.Could be wear and tear.
Something doesnt have to fall very far at all to double its impact on landing. My impression is like 10feet. But could be off, and there are all types of variables.
Canadian astronauts will start flying to the moon in 2023 with NASA's Artemis missions | Space
High-level sources have confirmed two of the Canadian astronauts, or “Eh-stronauts”, have already begun training.
View attachment 331235