Space Exploration

Are NASA's future missions and budget justified?

  • It's worth the time and expenditures

    Votes: 222 66.1%
  • Complete waste of money

    Votes: 41 12.2%
  • We need to explore, but not at the current cost

    Votes: 73 21.7%

  • Total voters
    336

I fully expect this rocket to blow up shortly after takeoff. Not that I wish for that to happen, but Boeing seems to be lost in a sea of cost overruns and failures with this project, and I get no sense that they have a clue about what they're doing. I read an article just today that hurricane Nicole tore a strip of Home Depot caulking off of the rocket, and they weren't sure if it was safe to launch. If a cat 1 hurricane can tear caulking off of a rocket, what do they think will happen on its way to space when it's travelling over the speed of sound shortly after takeoff.
 
I fully expect this rocket to blow up shortly after takeoff. Not that I wish for that to happen, but Boeing seems to be lost in a sea of cost overruns and failures with this project, and I get no sense that they have a clue about what they're doing. I read an article just today that hurricane Nicole tore a strip of Home Depot caulking off of the rocket, and they weren't sure if it was safe to launch. If a cat 1 hurricane can tear caulking off of a rocket, what do they think will happen on its way to space when it's travelling over the speed of sound shortly after takeoff.
I hope you are wrong.
 
I hope you are wrong.
I do too, but I have a brother that retired from NASA and said that they are so overrun with bureaucrats that they can't get out of their own way. It's not the same NASA that sent men to the moon over 50 years ago. I just see failure after failure with NASA, they couldn't even get to the space station without Russia until SpaceX came along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
I fully expect this rocket to blow up shortly after takeoff. Not that I wish for that to happen, but Boeing seems to be lost in a sea of cost overruns and failures with this project, and I get no sense that they have a clue about what they're doing. I read an article just today that hurricane Nicole tore a strip of Home Depot caulking off of the rocket, and they weren't sure if it was safe to launch. If a cat 1 hurricane can tear caulking off of a rocket, what do they think will happen on its way to space when it's travelling over the speed of sound shortly after takeoff.

Like Cagle, I hope you are wrong as well. Boeing has been fairly inefficient these days in the space game. Lucky thing is, none of the tech (other than computers and programming) is new or untested. The SRBs are built on STS tech as are the RS-25 engines that are extremely proven. The upper stage in the beginning is basically a reworked Delta IV rocket, again, a reliable and proven system with an RL10 engine that's been used for 50+ years.

Really, the only thing that should go wrong is the software as the hardware generally is mature and proven. But... as we saw with Starliner, the software could pose a serious problem.

I hope I'm wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol

VN Store



Back
Top