CagleMtnVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2008
- Messages
- 27,694
- Likes
- 44,174
Looks like. Not sure I like that it's the same name as a shuttle. Unless it would of been something like Challenger II, or Columbia II or I'd have been for Enterprise II.
So I've seen different sides of this on several sites. Some think it's a worthy goal, others think it's a waste of money that could be better spent on more earthly projects.
How does VN feel about the budgets for NASA as well as the goals in our space programs?
ETA: NASA budget typically runs $17-18 Billion and change.
Budget of NASA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Recap vid!
I'm the opposite I think we are entering a very exciting time with Orion and Artemis scheduled to launch next year. Starliner coming in a few months the continued development of the Lunar Gateway program and of course the development of Starship. Even other private companies like Blue Origin which we really haven't heard anything from in months.I have found myself less interested in this whole thing than at any time in manned flight. These guys (yeah they are testing certain systems), but as time goes on, these guys won't be needed. They won't be pilots. This 'capsule' is designed to autonomously go to the ISS and dock. In the NEAR future, everybody on board will be a passenger and nothing more. Any capsule tour I have seen has focused on the windows and the seats and suits than the controls.
It's boring and unexciting. Spam in a can.
Fire away
Here's an interesting video game for you. I crashed the first time due to closure rate but now I can do a 360 roll or loop before attaching. It ain't hard. Null out the roll pitch and yaw with the right side controls, then use the translational controls on the left to dock. Keep all your rates in the green and you are good to go.
SPACEX - ISS Docking Simulator