Star gazers

#26
#26
While I agree we will be better in 2011, we will still be VERY Young.

Our SR class will basically be pretty non-existant and while we have some talented contributors that will be JR's our numbers are pretty low there as well.

So the majority of the team will be SO's and FR again.

That is why 2012 we will take a huge jump!

I'm with you, 2012 is when I feel we go for SEC championship (which equates to NC). All I'm saying is with Florida losing 4 OL, Arkansas losing Mallet, Bama reworking all new team chemistry, and our home schedule next year 9 wins is a distinct possibility. How would that feel compared to this year?
 
#28
#28
I believe it's because he counts back to the 2010 class, which is fine because it gives us an extra spot this year. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm aware he is backcounted towards 2010 but someone said he would count in Rivals final ranking. IDK that I've ever heard of them doing that before? Just wanted to be sure that was accurate.
 
#29
#29
I'm aware he is backcounted towards 2010 but someone said he would count in Rivals final ranking. IDK that I've ever heard of them doing that before? Just wanted to be sure that was accurate.

Total guess here, but i assume they rank the class based on the year the kid signs. How the scholarship is applied to what year is a numbers game and, i assume, a technical thing and not taken into account in the ranking.
 
#30
#30
I prefer those that can work the count nice and long and then drive in the run...........

Wait, are we talking about baseball?

I like the way you think girl. This is the second post Ive read from you with a little :yes: to it...

Good job, way to keep our attention...
 
#31
#31
I count seven four star commitments so far. Arnett, Johnson, Couch, Martin, Posey, Kerbyson, and Coleman are all four star prospects in one or more of the major ratings (Rivals, Scout, or ESPN). Hubbs and Rivals aren't the only game in town.
 
#32
#32
Dont forget Loften also. That gives us 8.

Then throw in Smith & Randolph that would be 10 if they were rated correctly.
 
#33
#33
Dont forget Loften also. That gives us 8.

Then throw in Smith & Randolph that would be 10 if they were rated correctly.

On that basis, then add Crowder too. All the ratings short change interior offensive linemen.
 
#34
#34
IMO, Crowder & Posey should'nt be 4*'s. I think Johnson, Martin, Coleman, Couch, Randolph, Smith, Kerbyson, & Arnett should be the 4*s. That would give us 8 & would put us right at top 15 in the nation if not in the top 15.
 
#36
#36
IMO, Crowder & Posey should'nt be 4*'s. I think Johnson, Martin, Coleman, Couch, Randolph, Smith, Kerbyson, & Arnett should be the 4*s. That would give us 8 & would put us right at top 15 in the nation if not in the top 15.

Crowder's recruiting video is very impressive. Posey... maybe not... his video shows a great big strong kid knocking other kids down, but doesn't show much in terms of footwork and technique. I believe he can be coached up in that regard though.
 

VN Store



Back
Top