I hope SS wins![]()
Why? I mean I dislike USC, but just because Alcoholism is viewed as a disability doesn't mean that someone shouldn't be able to be fired for it. Trying to lead impressionable young men while an alcoholic??
I sort of think USC should have went with an interim head coach while SS was in rehab and he would take over the head coaching job when he was out of rehab.
The semantics are pretty important. You can't be fired for being an alcoholic. You absolutely can be fired for drinking on the job or showing up to work while plastered.
I'm not sure what's more scary, the fact he's thinks he can win a $30 million lawsuit for showing up drunk on the job or the fact California recognizes alcoholism as a disability.
Good grief, I coulda been disabled in California for the past twenty years.
Im pretty sure he knows he wont win a court decision. These type of things are for settlements out of court. The sad part he will probably get like 1 million to get lost.
Spot on.
And honestly, USC should pay out a settlement and consider it a lesson learned. They knew that Sarkisian had a problem before they hired him. This wasn't news to them. Sometimes it costs a bunch of money to fix your mistakes.
Still doesn't change the fact California has some goofy laws. Much less that an employee can file a suit over it.
Addiction =/= Disability
Coming from a reformed alcoholic, I can speak with some certainty on the matter.
Exactly, but with the direction things are heading culturally it won't be long before it's ok because they have a 'disease', unfortunately.The semantics are pretty important. You can't be fired for being an alcoholic. You absolutely can be fired for drinking on the job or showing up to work while plastered.