ajvol01
GBO!
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 25,426
- Likes
- 30,006
Sorry, not following.I posted this in another thread as a crude example of how a ticker could see a short position over 100%.
This can be accomplished with a relatively small amount of shares in theory. If hedge fund A takes a 5% short position in a company, they sell those shares on the open market. Hedge fund B could then take an identical 5% short position with, in theory, the same shares that were shorted and sold by A. B then sells the same shares at market price. If this is done 25 times, you end up with a company having 125% of their shares being shorted when only 5% of their shares changed hands. This is an exaggerated example, but it shows how GME could see a short position of 138%.
I assumed 138% meant that at that specific moment in time there were 38% more shares being shorted than actually exist.
I’m completely ignorant of the stock market, so your explanation may be accurate but I didn’t understand the “if this is done 25 times” bit - I get that 5% x 25 = 125%, but if A and B are selling wouldn’t that eliminate the short position?