You know you seem that regardless of what is said you want to be pissed off about this regardless of what is posted.
I have to be honest right now I’m more concerned how bad ATT is going to screw up the fiber install on my house on Tuesday than I am about any potential fallout from SVB. The article also mentioned Signature bank in NY, NY was also shut down under apparently similar circumstances. I read that as more bad risk management. And I’m still more worried about ATT than I am either of these banks.
Depositors will have access to all of their money.Treasury, Federal Reserve, FDIC release joint statement mapping out approach to Silicon Valley Bank collapse
Depositors will have access to all of their money starting Monday, March 13. The taxpayer will bear no losses associated with the resolution of SVB.
Any losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund to support uninsured depositors will be recovered by a special assessment on banks, as required by law.
The Federal Reserve said it would make additional funding available to "eligible depository institutions to help assure banks have the ability to meet the needs of all their depositors."
About four posts up is an article outlining the plan. I inferred that they are letting the banks use the depressed valued treasuries as collateral at their original purchase price instead of their current depressed value with a loan term of up to one year. They can’t buy the treasuries as that would realize the loss at their current depressed value.Depositors will have access to all of their money.
Taxpayers will bear no losses.
Well who is paying up?
WAPO actually spilled the beans.About four posts up is an article outlining the plan. I inferred that they are letting the banks use the depressed valued treasuries as collateral at their original purchase price instead of their current depressed value with a loan term of up to one year. They can’t buy the treasuries as that would realize the loss at their current depressed value.
TLDR version. Very favorable loan terms for one year loans.
Earlier in the day, in calls with federal banking regulators late Saturday and Sunday, Democrats said they were “praying for a buyer,” said Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.), a member of the House Financial Services Committee.
The assertions that the decisions do not amount to a “bailout,” however, are likely to be challenged by critics of the move. While the fund going to the depositors is paid into by U.S. banks, it is ultimately backstopped by the Treasury Department — and therefore U.S. taxpayers.