Supreme Court rules against LGBTQ

[SpaceCoastVol]

How do you feel about the special Olympics? Anyone can compete?

Give it another year or so.

 

[creekdipper]

Give it another year or so.

Johnny Knoxville...a man ahead of his time.

 

[Sea Ray]

I think my opinion is as clear as I could possibly make it and I think a person of average intelligence could figure it out even from just the posts that I’ve made responding to you. The fact that you read my posts are interested enough to ask my opinion but won’t read to see why I’m not venting my spleen about this like the rest of you is on you.

You stated your opinion clearly? Let's recap. I asked this question directly of you:

Rather than respond with such sarcastic personal attacks, which of course get us nowhere, how 'bout responding with substance? How 'bout clearly stating your stance on trans folks like Lia Thomas competing in women's sports?

And this was your response:

As soon as you all clearly state your stance on PED testing in Masters CrossFit with similar quantity and intensity of outrage.

When I questioned you again you replied:

“with similar quantity and intensity of outrage.”

I’m sure you’ll get the point eventually.

No editing there Rocky Top. You did not answer my question. At least admit that much. The evidence is here for everyone to see. You have not stated whether you feel it's proper for Lia Thomas to compete against biological women. We all see your deflections right here in print

 

[RockyTop85]

You stated your opinion clearly? Let's recap. I asked this question directly of you:



And this was your response:




When I questioned you again you replied:



No editing there Rocky Top. You did not answer my question. At least admit that much. The evidence is here for everyone to see. You have not stated whether you feel it's proper for Lia Thomas to compete against biological women. We all see your deflections right here in print

The answer to your question was apparent even before you asked and it has been discussed openly since you asked.

If you weren’t smart enough to figure that out, then not answering you directly separates the wheat from the chaffe and saves me from a discussion with a moron.

If you didn’t bother to read the prior discussion, then not answering your question directly saves me from repeating myself or having to argue with you about the context of what I’ve said before.

You’re not under any obligation to read the thread, but acting like my responses to you are the only ones that exist is downright idiotic.

 

[C-south]

The answer to your question was apparent even before you asked if and it has been discussed openly since you asked.

If you weren’t smart enough to figure that out then not answering you directly separates the wheat from the chaffe and saves me from a discussion with a moron.

If you didn’t bother to read the prior discussion, then not answering your question directly saves me from repeating myself or having to argue with you about the context of what I’ve said before.

You’re not under any obligation to read the thread, but acting like my responses to you are the only ones that exist is downright idiotic.

Lol. That’s all you’ve done without answering anything. The only thing to determine is you like looking at sausage compete at girls sporting events.

 

[Sea Ray]

The answer to your question was apparent even before you asked and it has been discussed openly since you asked.

If you weren’t smart enough to figure that out, then not answering you directly separates the wheat from the chaffe and saves me from a discussion with a moron.

If you didn’t bother to read the prior discussion, then not answering your question directly saves me from repeating myself or having to argue with you about the context of what I’ve said before.

You’re not under any obligation to read the thread, but acting like my responses to you are the only ones that exist is downright idiotic.

So once you hit rock bottom you just keep digging? You've been caught and documented with avoiding my question and then you go back to your methods of deflection and personal attacks. It would take no more energy and time on your part to answer my question. If you stated it previously, please understand that this is a huge site and I very well may have missed it. You've now spent no less than 4 posts avoiding an answer. That's very telling that you got nothing. Care to make it 5?

 

[RockyTop85]

So once you hit rock bottom you just keep digging? You've been caught and documented with avoiding my question and then you go back to your methods of deflection and personal attacks. It would take no more energy and time on your part to answer my question. If you stated it previously, please understand that this is a huge site and I very well may have missed it. You've now spent no less than 4 posts avoiding an answer. That's very telling that you got nothing. Care to make it 5?

Absolutely:

You’re not under any obligation to read the thread, but acting like my responses to you are the only ones that exist is downright idiotic.

But I’m invoking the “saved me from discussion with a moron” clause and you’re on the bench with the other morons, going forward.

 

[kiddiedoc]

Absolutely:

You’re not under any obligation to read the thread, but acting like my responses to you are the only ones that exist is downright idiotic.

But I’m invoking the “saved me from discussion with a moron” clause and you’re on the bench with the other morons, going forward.

I believe you have your benches backwards, sir.

 

[RockyTop85]

I believe you have your benches backwards, sir.

Then they can all sit backwards.

 

[Sea Ray]

Absolutely:

You’re not under any obligation to read the thread, but acting like my responses to you are the only ones that exist is downright idiotic.

But I’m invoking the “saved me from discussion with a moron” clause and you’re on the bench with the other morons, going forward.

Let the record show I gave you every opportunity to say whether you support Lia Thomas competing vs women in swimming and you deflected every time. I was extremely patient. I made every attempt to discuss straight politics with you and the above is what we got

 

[whodeycin85]

Let the record show I gave you every opportunity to say whether you support Lia Thomas competing vs women in swimming and you deflected every time. I was extremely patient. I made every attempt to discuss straight politics with you and the above is what we got

He doesn't support men in women's sports..he is saying the outrage is blown out of proportion due to conservative politics....he has mentioned that a few times prior to your questions

 

[Sea Ray]

He doesn't support men in women's sports..he is saying the outrage is blown out of proportion due to conservative politics....he has mentioned that a few times prior to your questions

If that's the case then why couldn't he answer my question that way? It'd have taken far less energy than than responding the way he did. I actually disagree with you. According to this post, he gives the impression that he's not stated his opinion on whether to allow Lia Thomas to compete vs women:

Lmao. There we have it. The only play on the moron’s playbook.

Go ahead and quote where I made any qualitative judgment about those rules. I’ll wait.

Actually, I’d prefer if you change your pants for a pair of Depends and mop up this mess as well. The smell of you *****ing your pants is getting overwhelming.

He clearly says he's not "made any qualitative judgment about those rules."

 

[whodeycin85]

If that's the case then why couldn't he answer my question that way? It'd have taken far less energy than than responding the way he did. I actually disagree with you. According to this post, he gives the impression that he's not stated his opinion on whether to allow Lia Thomas to compete vs women:



He clearly says he's not "made any qualitative judgment about those rules."

Your right...He hasn't come right out an said it...he is kinda eluding...but with his background getting a straight answer won't happen...being a Dem lawyer... you lucky to get any answer that isn't Kamala like in nature

 

[RockyTop85]

Your right...He hasn't come right out an said it...he is kinda eluding...but with his background getting a straight answer won't happen...being a Dem lawyer... you lucky to get any answer that isn't Kamala like in nature

I’ve “come right out and said” whether I believe it is a good rule at least three times in this thread, and was alluding to it well before then.

Hell, I gave a half dozen reasons why the harm was being overblown and half of them were predicated on the near-universal understanding that male anatomy grants a distinct athletic advantage.

 

[Sea Ray]

I’ve “come right out and said” whether I believe it is a good rule at least three times in this thread, and was alluding to it well before then.

Hell, I gave a half dozen reasons why the harm was being overblown and half of them were predicated on the near-universal understanding that male anatomy grants a distinct athletic advantage.

I apologize for missing it. I don't even know precisely what rule you're referring to. My question to you was specific to Lia Thomas. Do you think Lia should be permitted to compete in women's swimming. I do not. I feel Lia has benefitted from physically from being biologically male. This is why we have separate sports for men and women. I don't think Lia taking female hormones for a period of time should allow this person to compete as a female

 

[Fun coupon VOL]

Ehh, that absolutely was the case years ago (at least at the college level). The womens game was much better with fundamentals and team basketball but now to many of the women are trying to play like men and they can't.

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/-Erbx1wT_VM